Ropes Crossing vs Shalvey
In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Ropes Crossing, most households own their home and most households are couple families. In Shalvey, about half of households rent. Houses cost more in Ropes Crossing: a median of $1.05 million, against $869,000 in Shalvey, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Ropes Crossing tends to suit families with children and couples, while Shalvey suits renters and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Ropes Crossing
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (57/100 vs 89/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (81% vs 71%)
- But Shalvey has more separate houses rather than flats (92% vs 78%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Ropes Crossing leaves households under less mortgage stress (24% vs 38%)
- Shalvey has cheaper houses ($869,250 vs $1,050,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Shalvey
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (53% vs 29%)
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $480/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Shalvey
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (45 min vs 51 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (49.6 km vs 52.1 km)
- But Ropes Crossing is more walkable (69/100 vs 61/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Ropes Crossing
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (22% vs 8%)
- carries lower crime risk (57/100 vs 89/100)
- is more walkable (69/100 vs 61/100)
- But Shalvey has more residents already 65 and over (13% vs 7%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Ropes Crossing
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (18.0% vs -0.3%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Ropes Crossing and Shalvey drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Ropes Crossing has more residents (7,280 vs 3,455); Ropes Crossing has higher household incomes ($115,232 vs $61,360).
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,280 +53% vs other | 3,455 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +18.0% | -0.3% |
| Median age | 31 | 32 |
| Median household income | $115,232/yr +47% vs other | $61,360/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $480/wk +38% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,050,000 | $869,250 |
| Median unit price | $600,000 | — |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 32 days from 58 sales | 17 days from 21 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
31 vs 42 sales
61 vs 11 sales
Zoning mix
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Other and special use | 95% | 0% |
| Residential | 0% | 56% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 29% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 15% |
| Rural and farming | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,325 across Blacktown same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -18% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.5% $765/wk on $1.13M | 3.4% $585/wk on $900K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 51% of NSW | Higher than 39% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 79% of NSW | Higher than 23% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of NSW | Higher than 85% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 74% of NSW | Higher than 39% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 94% of NSW | Higher than 82% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 47% of NSW | Higher than 38% of NSW |
Liveability
Ropes Crossing scores higher overall (66 vs 23); Ropes Crossing is more walkable (69 vs 61).
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | D |
| Score | 66/100 | 23/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Shalvey carries more bushfire risk (58 vs 0); Shalvey carries more crime risk (89 vs 57).
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | High 89/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Penrith, 6.4 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Penrith, 8.6 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.9% | 0.9% |
Schools in Ropes Crossing
- Ropes Crossing Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Shalvey
- Chifley College Shalvey Campus Government · Secondary at peers
- Shalvey Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 same for both | |
| Childcare | 3 | 1 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 2 | 0 |
Mobility
Ropes Crossing sits further from the CBD (52.1 km vs 49.6 km).
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 52.1 km +5% vs other | 49.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 51 min | 45 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 71.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 70.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2760 | 0.3% postcode 2770 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 34 postcode 2760 | 37 postcode 2770 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.8%).
Setting
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 40 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 45 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 43.2 km | 41.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 89/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 58% 1,125 premises | 0% 1,183 premises |
Climate
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 822 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 7.2 µg/m³ | 5.6 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 16.3 µg/m³ | 17.6 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.6 pphm | 0.55 pphm |
Council rates
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,157/yr same for both | |
| Council | Blacktown same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Chifley same for both | |
| Member | Ed Husic same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Ropes Crossing | Shalvey | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Ropes Crossing
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Ropes Crossing
Other comparisons with Shalvey
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.