Rockingham vs Silky Oak
Silky Oak is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 48 in Rockingham. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. On these figures, Rockingham tends to suit young adults, while Silky Oak suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Rockingham
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (9% vs 19%)
- has cheaper rent ($160/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Silky Oak
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (1058 min vs 1069 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (1554.5 km vs 1561.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Silky Oak
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (28.1% vs -2.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Rockingham and Silky Oak drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Silky Oak has more residents (178 vs 104); Silky Oak rents higher ($250/wk vs $160/wk).
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104 | 178 +71% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -2.8% | +28.1% |
| Median age | 48 | 39 |
| Median household income | $94,224/yr +26% vs other | $69,836/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $160/wk | $250/wk +56% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.2%).
Development activity
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 186 across Cassowary Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +68% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 67% of QLD | Higher than 37% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 12% of QLD | Higher than 55% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 15% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 42% of QLD | Higher than 67% of QLD |
Liveability
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Rockingham carries more bushfire risk (53 vs 0).
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 53/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 52/100 same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | High 72/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 6 | 1 |
Mobility
Rockingham sits further from the CBD (1561.3 km vs 1554.5 km).
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 1561.3 km | 1554.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 1069 min | 1058 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 4854 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 48 postcode 4854 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.9%).
Setting
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 6 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 12 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.7 km | 10.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 31/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 46 premises | 1% 94 premises |
Climate
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 2,150 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 16.0°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,829/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cassowary Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kennedy same for both | |
| Member | Bob Katter same for both | |
| Party | Katter's Australian Party (KAP) same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Rockingham | Silky Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Rockingham
Other comparisons with Silky Oak
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.