Richmond vs Rural View
In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Richmond: a median of $940,000, against $745,000 in Rural View, though rent is higher in Rural View. On these figures, Richmond tends to suit couples, while Rural View suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Rural View
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (8 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Richmond has cheaper land ($325,000 vs $540,000)
- Rural View has cheaper houses ($745,000 vs $940,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Richmond
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 17%)
- has cheaper rent ($375/wk vs $420/wk)
- But Rural View has a bigger rental market to choose from (28% vs 5%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Richmond has a shorter drive in (667 min vs 672 min)
- Rural View is more walkable (62/100 vs 4/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Rural View
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (62/100 vs 4/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Richmond
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (75.3% vs 18.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Richmond and Rural View drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rural View has more residents (5,657 vs 852); Richmond has higher household incomes ($164,788 vs $128,492).
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 852 | 5,657 +564% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +75.3% | +18.0% |
| Median age | 33 | 31 |
| Median household income | $164,788/yr +22% vs other | $128,492/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $375/wk | $420/wk +12% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $940,000 | $745,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $465,000 |
| Median land price | $325,000 | $540,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 36 days from 19 sales | 23 days from 87 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
29 vs 133 sales
5 vs 15 sales
Development activity
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Mackay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -6% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 5.1% $770/wk on $789K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 98% of QLD | Higher than 93% of QLD |
| Schools | — | Higher than 92% of QLD |
| Walkability | Higher than 66% of QLD | Higher than 90% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 40% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of QLD same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 92% of QLD |
Liveability
Rural View is more walkable (62 vs 4); Rural View scores higher overall (69 vs 61).
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 61/100 | 69/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Richmond
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Rural View
- Eimeo Road State School Government · Primary above peers
- St Brendan's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Mackay Northern Beaches State High School Government · Secondary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 5 |
| Childcare | 0 | 8 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 7 | 8 |
Mobility
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 4/100 | 62/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 976.7 km | 975.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 667 min | 672 min |
| Public transport score | 25/100 Bus | 43/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 3.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 14.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 12 min scheduled, not actual | 2 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4740 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 4740 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.9%).
Setting
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 24 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 10 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.5 km | 3.3 km 3.7 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 83/100 | 84/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 72% 505 premises | 72% 2,368 premises |
Climate
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,633 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.6°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 14.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,873/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mackay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dawson same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Willcox same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Richmond | Rural View | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Rural View
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Richmond
Other comparisons with Rural View
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.