Retro vs Dysart
Dysart is the younger of the two, with a median age of 32 against 36 in Retro. In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Retro, the large majority of households own their home and about half of households are couple families. In Dysart, most households rent. On these figures, Retro tends to suit older residents, while Dysart suits young adults.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Retro carries lower crime risk (36/100 vs 63/100)
- Dysart has more parks and reserves (6 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
Renters
Dysart
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($100/wk vs $175/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Dysart
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (653 min vs 673 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (956.5 km vs 966.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Retro
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 6%)
- carries lower crime risk (36/100 vs 63/100)
- But Dysart has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Retro
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (80.0% vs -2.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Retro and Dysart drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Dysart has more residents (2,918 vs 54); Retro rents higher ($175/wk vs $100/wk).
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54 | 2,918 +5304% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +80.0% | -2.4% |
| Median age | 36 | 32 |
| Median household income | $100,724/yr | $127,088/yr +26% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $175/wk +43% vs other | $100/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
Property market
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $240,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 72 days from 70 sales |
Development activity
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 35 across Central Highlands (Qld) | 27 across Isaac |
| Approvals change year on year | -75% | +0% |
Gross rental yield
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 7.7% $440/wk on $299K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 75% of QLD | Higher than 93% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 43% of QLD | Higher than 68% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — | Higher than 15% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 15% of QLD | Higher than 80% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 100% of QLD |
Liveability
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 27/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Dysart carries more bushfire risk (25 vs 0); Dysart carries more crime risk (63 vs 36).
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 25/100 |
| Crime | Low 36/100 | Moderate 63/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 2 |
Schools in Retro
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Dysart
- Dysart State High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Dysart State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 6 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 86 |
Mobility
Retro sits further from the CBD (966.2 km vs 956.5 km).
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 4/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 966.2 km +1% vs other | 956.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 673 min | 653 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 4723 | 0.1% postcode 4745 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 43 postcode 4723 | 15 postcode 4745 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (70.1%).
Setting
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 300 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 213 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 70/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 18 premises | 47% 1,602 premises |
Council rates
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,276/yr | $925/yr |
| Council | Central Highlands (Qld) | Isaac |
Federal electorate
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Flynn | Capricornia |
| Member | Colin Boyce | Michelle Landry |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Retro | Dysart | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Dysart
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Retro
Other comparisons with Dysart
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.