Renown Park vs Prospect
In Renown Park, about half of households rent and about half of households are people living alone. In Prospect, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Prospect: a median of $1.31 million, against $932,000 in Renown Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Renown Park tends to suit renters, people living alone, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Prospect
ahead on 5 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (17 vs 0)
- has more childcare (13 vs 1)
- has more schools inside the suburb (6 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Renown Park has cheaper houses ($932,500 vs $1,310,000)
- Prospect leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 31%)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Renown Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (53% vs 36%)
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $350/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Prospect
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (91/100 vs 80/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Prospect
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- is more walkable (91/100 vs 80/100)
- But Renown Park has more units and townhouses to downsize into (47% vs 32%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Prospect
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (9.8% vs -2.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Renown Park and Prospect drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Prospect has more residents (14,584 vs 1,663); Prospect has higher household incomes ($104,052 vs $60,528).
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,663 | 14,584 +777% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -2.0% | +9.8% |
| Median age | 37 same for both | |
| Median household income | $60,528/yr | $104,052/yr +72% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk | $350/wk +40% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $932,500 | $1,310,000 |
| Median unit price | $619,000 | $607,000 |
| Median land price | — | $800,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 46 days from 10 sales | 19 days from 106 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
17 vs 104 sales
5 vs 54 sales
Zoning mix
Prospect has more commercially zoned land (17% vs 2%).
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 98% | 79% |
| Commercial | 2% | 17% |
| Industrial | 0% | 2% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,636 across Charles Sturt | 203 across Prospect |
| Approvals change year on year | +109% | +757% |
Gross rental yield
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.8% $740/wk on $1.01M |
| Units | — | 5.3% $595/wk on $588K |
Ranking within SA
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 57% of SA | Higher than 80% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 28% of SA | Higher than 82% of SA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 64% of SA |
| Walkability | Higher than 93% of SA | Higher than 99% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 13% of SA | Higher than 32% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of SA | Higher than 87% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 95% of SA | Higher than 99% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 42% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 79% of SA |
Liveability
Prospect scores higher overall (70 vs 42); Prospect is more walkable (91 vs 80).
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | A |
| Score | 42/100 | 70/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 87/100 | High 79/100 |
| Flood | High 78/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 22 within 5 km | 27 within 5 km |
Schools
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 6 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 4.8 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 5.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.0% | 3.9% |
Schools in Renown Park
- Brompton Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Prospect
- Blackfriars Priory School Catholic · Combined above peers
- Prospect Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Prescott College Independent · Secondary at peers
- Rosary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Prospect North Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Sports College South Australia - North Adelaide Football Club Independent · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 5 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 22 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 17 |
| Childcare | 1 | 13 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 4 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 8 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
Mobility
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 80/100 | 91/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 5.6 km +5% vs other | 5.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 11 min | 12 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Rail · Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 33.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 299.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 5008 | 1.5% postcode 5082 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 48 postcode 5008 | 50 postcode 5082 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.2%).
Setting
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 17 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 39 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.2 km | 9.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 86/100 | 99/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 51% 879 premises | 97% 7,328 premises |
Climate
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ | — |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ | — |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm | 0.51 pphm |
Council rates
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,726/yr | $2,363/yr |
| Council | Charles Sturt | Prospect |
Federal electorate
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Adelaide same for both | |
| Member | Steve Georganas same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Renown Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Renown Park
Prospect
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Renown Park
Other comparisons with Prospect
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.