Relbia vs White Hills
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Relbia, most households are couple families. In White Hills, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Relbia tends to suit couples.
Relbia and White Hills are both small, quiet rural communities in Tasmania with similarly mature populations and minimal crime and flood risk. The most significant difference is household income: Relbia's median of $137,228 per year is nearly double White Hills' $69,316, and Relbia also ranks higher on the socio-economic decile (10 versus 4). Relbia has a larger population at 691 people compared to White Hills' 172, and carries a lower bushfire risk rating of 22 versus 32. Weekly rent is slightly higher in White Hills at $275 compared to Relbia's $250, though both suburbs are equally remote from Hobart and equally car-dependent.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 5 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Relbia
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (10% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $275/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Relbia
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (193 km vs 196.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
White Hills
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 20%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Relbia
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (1.9% vs -5.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Relbia and White Hills drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Relbia has more residents (691 vs 172); Relbia has higher household incomes ($137,228 vs $69,316).
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 691 +75% vs other | 172 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.9% | -5.5% |
| Median age | 48 | 49 |
| Median household income | $137,228/yr +49% vs other | $69,316/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk | $275/wk +10% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.8%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,250,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 97% | 98% |
| Environmental | 1% same for both | |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 184 across Northern Midlands | 208 across Launceston |
| Approvals change year on year | +104% | -29% |
Ranking within TAS
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 99% of TAS | Higher than 53% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 25% of TAS | Higher than 65% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 72% of TAS same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 91% of TAS | Higher than 71% of TAS |
Liveability
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | — |
| Score | 64/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
White Hills carries more bushfire risk (32 vs 22).
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 22/100 | Low 32/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Moderate 50/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Launceston, 9.8 km | None |
Amenities in the suburb
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 8 | 2 |
Mobility
White Hills sits further from the CBD (196.1 km vs 193 km).
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 193 km | 196.1 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 141 min | 142 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 7258 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 42 postcode 7258 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.7%).
Setting
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 79 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 238 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 94/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 92% 307 premises | 0% 76 premises |
Climate
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 676 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,704/yr | $2,075/yr |
| Council | Northern Midlands | Launceston |
Federal electorate
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyons | Bass |
| Member | Rebecca White | Jess Teesdale |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Relbia | White Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Relbia
Other comparisons with White Hills
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.