Regency Park vs Prospect
Prospect is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 81 in Regency Park. In Prospect, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Prospect: a median of $1.31 million, against $833,000 in Regency Park, though rent is higher in Regency Park. Prospect is closer to the city centre: 5.3 km, against 9.7 km. On these figures, Regency Park tends to suit older residents and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Prospect
ahead on 4 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (17 vs 0)
- has more childcare (13 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (6 vs 0)
Weighs schools, crime, parks, and childcare.
First-home buyers
Regency Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($833,000 vs $1,310,000)
Weighs house prices.
Renters
Prospect
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 62%)
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $450/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Prospect
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (5.3 km vs 9.7 km)
- is more walkable (91/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Prospect
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- is more walkable (91/100 vs 58/100)
- carries lower crime risk (79/100 vs 100/100)
- But Regency Park has more residents already 65 and over (77% vs 14%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Prospect
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (9.8% vs -55.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Regency Park and Prospect drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Prospect has more residents (14,584 vs 60); Prospect has higher household incomes ($104,052 vs $37,700).
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60 | 14,584 +24207% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -55.2% | +9.8% |
| Median age | 81 | 37 |
| Median household income | $37,700/yr | $104,052/yr +176% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk +22% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (40.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Property market
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $833,000 | $1,310,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $607,000 |
| Median land price | — | $800,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 3 sales | 19 days from 106 sales |
Zoning mix
Regency Park has more industrially zoned land (80% vs 2%); Prospect has more commercially zoned land (17% vs 0%).
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial | 80% | 2% |
| Residential | 9% | 79% |
| Commercial | 0% | 17% |
| Parks and recreation | 11% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,176 across Port Adelaide Enfield | 203 across Prospect |
| Approvals change year on year | +23% | +757% |
Gross rental yield
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.8% $740/wk on $1.01M |
| Units | — | 5.3% $595/wk on $588K |
Ranking within SA
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 15% of SA | Higher than 80% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 5% of SA | Higher than 82% of SA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 64% of SA |
| Walkability | Higher than 83% of SA | Higher than 99% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 10% of SA | Higher than 32% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 55% of SA | Higher than 87% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 96% of SA | Higher than 99% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 42% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 79% of SA |
Liveability
Prospect is more walkable (91 vs 58).
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | A |
| Score | — | 70/100 |
| Socio-economic band | — | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Regency Park carries more crime risk (100 vs 79).
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 100/100 | High 79/100 |
| Flood | High 70/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 35 within 5 km | 27 within 5 km |
Schools
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 6 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Mawson Lakes Campus, 6.8 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 5.2 km |
Schools in Regency Park
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Prospect
- Blackfriars Priory School Catholic · Combined above peers
- Prospect Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Prescott College Independent · Secondary at peers
- Rosary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Prospect North Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Sports College South Australia - North Adelaide Football Club Independent · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 5 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 22 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 17 |
| Childcare | 0 | 13 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 4 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 8 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 3 |
Mobility
Regency Park sits further from the CBD (9.7 km vs 5.3 km).
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 58/100 | 91/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 9.7 km +45% vs other | 5.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 16 min | 12 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Rail · Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 40.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 299.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 5010 | 1.5% postcode 5082 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 65 postcode 5010 | 50 postcode 5082 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (100.0%).
Setting
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 11 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 39 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.4 km | 9.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 88/100 | 99/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 52% 473 premises | 97% 7,328 premises |
Climate
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.51 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,311/yr | $2,363/yr |
| Council | Port Adelaide Enfield | Prospect |
Federal electorate
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Adelaide same for both | |
| Member | Steve Georganas same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Regency Park | Prospect | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Regency Park
Prospect
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Regency Park
Other comparisons with Prospect
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.