Reedy Creek vs Wangolina
Reedy Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 42 against 46 in Wangolina. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Reedy Creek, about half of households are people living alone. In Wangolina, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Reedy Creek tends to suit families with children and couples, while Wangolina suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Reedy Creek
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 1)
- is already more of a family suburb (54% vs 40%)
- But Wangolina carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 35/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Wangolina
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (18% vs 25%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Wangolina
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $216/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Wangolina
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (309.2 km vs 313.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Wangolina
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 35/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Wangolina
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (7.8% vs -1.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Reedy Creek and Wangolina drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Reedy Creek rents higher ($216/wk vs $0/wk); Reedy Creek has more residents (94 vs 69).
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 94 +27% vs other | 69 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.1% | +7.8% |
| Median age | 42 | 46 |
| Median household income | $68,224/yr | $73,632/yr +8% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $216/wk (not reported on the other side) | — |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.0%).
Zoning mix
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 98% |
| Environmental | 1% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 21 across Kingston (SA) same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +25% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 37% of SA | Higher than 47% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 31% of SA | Higher than 9% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 9% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 14% of SA | Higher than 4% of SA |
Liveability
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Reedy Creek carries more crime risk (35 vs 24).
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 17/100 | Low 14/100 |
| Crime | Low 35/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | High 92/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 1 |
Mobility
Reedy Creek sits further from the CBD (313.4 km vs 309.2 km).
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Adelaide | 313.4 km +1% vs other | 309.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 215 min | 213 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 5275 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 43 postcode 5275 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.0%).
Setting
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 7 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 18.8 km | 8.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 23 premises | 0% 16 premises |
Climate
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 527 mm | 620 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 22.5°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 8.7°C |
Council rates
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,515/yr same for both | |
| Council | Kingston (SA) same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Barker same for both | |
| Member | Tony Pasin same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Reedy Creek | Wangolina | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Wangolina
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Reedy Creek
Other comparisons with Wangolina
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.