Redwood Park vs Fairview Park
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Redwood Park is closer to the city centre: 18 km, against 21.6 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Redwood Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Redwood Park
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 57/100)
- has a shorter drive in (28 min vs 34 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (18 km vs 21.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Redwood Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (78/100 vs 57/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Fairview Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.4% vs -1.0%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Redwood Park and Fairview Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Redwood Park has more residents (5,367 vs 3,792).
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,367 +29% vs other | 3,792 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.0% | +5.4% |
| Median age | 40 same for both | |
| Median household income | $95,264/yr | $99,476/yr +4% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk | $370/wk +6% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.8%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $840,000 | $878,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $427,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 18 days from 54 sales | 18 days from 35 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
86 vs 62 sales
27 vs 41 sales
6 vs 5 sales
Zoning mix
Fairview Park has more land zoned for conservation (13% vs 0%).
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 99% | 64% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 15% |
| Environmental | 0% | 13% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 7% |
| Commercial | 1% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Tea Tree Gully same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +36% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $650/wk on $849K | 3.9% $600/wk on $800K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 22% of SA | Higher than 31% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 74% of SA | Higher than 78% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 91% of SA | Higher than 83% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 91% of SA | Higher than 89% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 53% of SA | Higher than 58% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 94% of SA | Higher than 86% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 55% of SA | Higher than 48% of SA |
Liveability
Redwood Park scores higher overall (64 vs 41); Redwood Park is more walkable (78 vs 57).
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 64/100 | 41/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Fairview Park carries more bushfire risk (55 vs 0).
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Crime | Low 33/100 | Low 32/100 |
| Flood | High 72/100 | High 77/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Adelaide University, Mawson Lakes Campus, 8.7 km | None |
Schools in Redwood Park
- Redwood Park Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Fairview Park
- Fairview Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 10 |
| Childcare | 5 same for both | |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 7 | 1 |
Mobility
Fairview Park sits further from the CBD (21.6 km vs 18 km).
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 78/100 | 57/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 18 km | 21.6 km +20% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 28 min | 34 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 63.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 74.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 5097 | 0.6% postcode 5126 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 63 postcode 5097 | 63 postcode 5126 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.6%).
Setting
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 165 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 221 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 13.7 km | 15.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 84/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 35% 2,217 premises | 0% 1,537 premises |
Climate
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 404 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — | 5.5 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | — | 18.7 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.51 pphm | 0.31 pphm |
Council rates
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,000/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tea Tree Gully same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Makin same for both | |
| Member | Tony Zappia same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Redwood Park | Fairview Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Redwood Park
Fairview Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Redwood Park
Other comparisons with Fairview Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.