Redfern vs Waterloo
Waterloo is the younger of the two, with a median age of 33 against 36 in Redfern. In both, most households rent, most homes are flats or apartments, and most households are people living alone. Redfern is closer to the city centre: 4.5 km, against 6.2 km. On these figures, Waterloo tends to suit renters and young adults.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Waterloo
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (20 vs 16)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Waterloo
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,710,000 vs $2,100,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Waterloo
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (75% vs 64%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Redfern
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more GPs (5 vs 3)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Waterloo
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is growing faster (12.1% vs -1.1%)
- returns a higher gross yield on units (5.6% vs 3.9%)
- But Redfern returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.4% vs 2.6%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Redfern and Waterloo drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Waterloo has more residents (16,379 vs 13,072); Redfern skews older (36 vs 33).
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,072 | 16,379 +25% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.1% | +12.1% |
| Median age | 36 | 33 |
| Median household income | $111,540/yr +5% vs other | $105,456/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $500/wk | $530/wk +6% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (35.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (29.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (11.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,100,000 | $1,710,000 |
| Median unit price | $980,000 | $930,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 80 sales | 20 days from 13 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
47 vs 7 sales
46 vs 8 sales
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
73 vs 103 sales
70 vs 156 sales
19 vs 33 sales
Zoning mix
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 64% | 73% |
| Commercial | 5% | 8% |
| Other and special use | 8% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 5% | 7% |
| Parks and recreation | 6% same for both | |
| Environmental | 2% | 0% |
| Planning zones cover 89% of Redfern and 94% of Waterloo. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,350 across Sydney same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +929% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $1,225/wk on $1.9M | 2.6% $935/wk on $1.85M |
| Units | 3.9% $815/wk on $1.1M | 5.6% $950/wk on $880K |
Ranking within NSW
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 85% of NSW | Higher than 79% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 77% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 100% of NSW same for both | |
| Affordability | Higher than 22% of NSW | Higher than 29% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 94% of NSW | Higher than 99% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 87% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 37% of NSW | Higher than 9% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 18% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
Liveability
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 73/100 | 74/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 94/100 | High 89/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 7 within 5 km | 8 within 5 km |
Schools
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 1-37 Foveaux Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010, 1.0 km | 3 1-37 Foveaux Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010, 1.6 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.8% | 4.7% |
Schools in Redfern
- Key College Independent · Secondary · Special school below peers
- Redfern Jarjum College Independent · Primary · Special school
Schools in Waterloo
- Our Lady of Mount Carmel Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Yudi Gunyi School Government · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 7 | 9 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 64 | 67 |
| Parks & reserves | 16 | 20 |
| Childcare | 8 same for both | |
| GPs | 5 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 4 | 3 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 3 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 same for both | |
Mobility
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 100/100 | 99/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 4.5 km | 6.2 km +38% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 12 min | 13 min |
| Public transport score | 95/100 Rail · Bus | 94/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 386.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 351.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.3% postcode 2016 | 3.7% postcode 2017 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 4 postcode 2016 | 1 postcode 2017 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.7%).
Setting
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 40 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 33 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.6 km 4.1 km to a named beach | 5.2 km 4.5 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the building same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 26% 9,091 premises | 28% 10,571 premises |
Climate
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,129 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 12.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.73 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $875/yr same for both | |
| Council | Sydney same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Sydney same for both | |
| Member | Tanya Plibersek same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Redfern | Waterloo | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Redfern
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Redfern
Other comparisons with Waterloo
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.