Redesdale vs Sutton Grange
Sutton Grange is the younger of the two, with a median age of 48 against 57 in Redesdale. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Redesdale, most households are people living alone. In Sutton Grange, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Redesdale tends to suit people living alone, while Sutton Grange suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Sutton Grange
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 51/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (71% vs 41%)
- But Redesdale has more parks and reserves (4 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Sutton Grange
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (19% vs 27%)
- has cheaper rent ($275/wk vs $320/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Redesdale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (117.6 km vs 122.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Redesdale has more residents already 65 and over (30% vs 24%)
- Sutton Grange carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 51/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Redesdale and Sutton Grange drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Redesdale has more residents (299 vs 160); Sutton Grange has higher household incomes ($74,724 vs $61,360).
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 299 +46% vs other | 160 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +24.6% | +21.2% |
| Median age | 57 | 48 |
| Median household income | $61,360/yr | $74,724/yr +22% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $320/wk +14% vs other | $275/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.7%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $799,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Sutton Grange has more rural and farming land (98% vs 63%); Redesdale has more land zoned for conservation (29% vs 0%).
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 63% | 98% |
| Environmental | 29% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 7% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 102 across Mount Alexander same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -7% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 22% of VIC | Higher than 41% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 17% of VIC | Higher than 26% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 76% of VIC | Higher than 71% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 40% of VIC | Higher than 41% of VIC |
Liveability
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Redesdale carries more crime risk (51 vs 28).
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 57/100 | Moderate 64/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 51/100 | Low 28/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Redesdale
- Redesdale Mia Mia Primary School Government · Primary
Schools in Sutton Grange
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 8 same for both | |
Mobility
Sutton Grange sits further from the CBD (122.3 km vs 117.6 km).
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 117.6 km | 122.3 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 88 min | 85 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.0% postcode 3444 | 0.9% postcode 3448 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 49 postcode 3444 | 68 postcode 3448 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.7%).
Setting
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 312 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 323 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 183 premises | 0% 79 premises |
Climate
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 553 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.6°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,885/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mount Alexander same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bendigo same for both | |
| Member | Lisa Chesters same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Redesdale | Sutton Grange | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Sutton Grange
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Redesdale
Other comparisons with Sutton Grange
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.