Redbank Creek vs Ravensbourne
Ravensbourne is the younger of the two, with a median age of 55 against 59 in Redbank Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Ravensbourne, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Ravensbourne tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Redbank Creek has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 87%)
- Ravensbourne carries lower crime risk (30/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Ravensbourne
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (20% vs 31%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Ravensbourne
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 25%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Redbank Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (92 min vs 110 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (115 km vs 132.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Ravensbourne
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (30/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Ravensbourne
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (23.8% vs -14.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Redbank Creek and Ravensbourne drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Ravensbourne has more residents (307 vs 124); Ravensbourne has higher household incomes ($71,500 vs $55,900).
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 124 | 307 +148% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -14.5% | +23.8% |
| Median age | 59 | 55 |
| Median household income | $55,900/yr | $71,500/yr +28% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $265/wk +6% vs other | $249/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (36.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (29.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 363 across Somerset | 1,513 across Toowoomba |
| Approvals change year on year | +375% | -25% |
Ranking within QLD
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 18% of QLD | Higher than 39% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 25% of QLD | Higher than 15% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 54% of QLD | Higher than 67% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 36% of QLD | Higher than 42% of QLD |
Liveability
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Redbank Creek carries more crime risk (68 vs 30).
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 67/100 | High 72/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 68/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Waterways | 29 | 13 |
Mobility
Ravensbourne sits further from the CBD (132.1 km vs 115 km).
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 115 km | 132.1 km +15% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 92 min | 110 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 4312 | 0.6% postcode 4352 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 91 postcode 4312 | 84 postcode 4352 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (85.3%).
Setting
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 356 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 620 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 27/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 81 premises | 0% 146 premises |
Climate
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 697 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,063/yr | $1,618/yr |
| Council | Somerset | Toowoomba |
Federal electorate
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Blair | Maranoa |
| Member | Shayne Neumann | David Littleproud |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland |
First Home Owner Grant
| Redbank Creek | Ravensbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Redbank Creek
Other comparisons with Ravensbourne
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.