Red Hill vs O'malley
Red Hill is the younger of the two, with a median age of 42 against 51 in O'Malley. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Red Hill is closer to the city centre: 10.2 km, against 14.2 km. On these figures, Red Hill tends to suit families with children, while O'Malley suits older residents.
Red Hill is a larger, more walkable suburb closer to the CBD, while O'Malley is quieter and more affluent. Red Hill has a younger population (median age 42 versus 51) and better walkability at 56 versus 38, sitting just 10.2 km from the city. However, O'Malley offers significantly higher household incomes at $232,752 annually and a stronger liveability score of 61 compared to Red Hill's 50. Rental costs differ sharply—O'Malley's median weekly rent of $975 far exceeds Red Hill's $500—and O'Malley units command higher prices at $1,510,000 versus $1,042,000. Red Hill suits buyers prioritising walkability and proximity to the CBD, while O'Malley appeals to those seeking a more established, affluent community.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Red Hill has more childcare (9 vs 0)
- O'malley carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Red Hill
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($1,042,000 vs $1,510,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Red Hill
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (22% vs 11%)
- has cheaper rent ($500/wk vs $975/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (13% vs 22%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Red Hill
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (56/100 vs 38/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (10.2 km vs 14.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Red Hill has more units and townhouses to downsize into (21% vs 4%)
- O'malley carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Red Hill is growing faster (-0.8% vs -6.4%)
- O'malley returns a higher gross yield on houses (5.7% vs 3.4%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Red Hill and O'malley drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Red Hill has more residents (3,146 vs 928); O'Malley rents higher ($975/wk vs $500/wk).
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,146 +71% vs other | 928 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.8% | -6.4% |
| Median age | 42 | 51 |
| Median household income | $204,776/yr | $232,752/yr +14% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $500/wk | $975/wk +95% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,307,500 | $2,400,000 |
| Median unit price | $1,042,000 | $1,510,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 58 days from 14 sales | 34 days from 8 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
13 vs 6 sales
6 vs 6 sales
Development activity
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $1,300/wk on $2M | 5.7% $1,775/wk on $1.62M |
| Units | 3.1% $755/wk on $1.25M | — |
Ranking within ACT
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 99% of ACT | Higher than 100% of ACT |
| Schools | Higher than 9% of ACT | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 39% of ACT | Higher than 24% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 90% of ACT | Higher than 51% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 49% of ACT | Higher than 62% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 13% of ACT | Higher than 99% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 5% of ACT | — |
Liveability
Red Hill is more walkable (56 vs 38); O'Malley scores higher overall (61 vs 50).
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 50/100 | 61/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
O'Malley carries more flood risk (16 vs 0); Red Hill carries more crime risk (59 vs 12).
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 86/100 | High 89/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 59/100 | Low 12/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 16/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 UNSW Canberra, 3.4 km | 2 UNSW Canberra, 5.6 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.4% | 4.6% |
Schools in Red Hill
- Red Hill Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- St Bede's Primary School Catholic · Primary below peers
- Canberra Grammar School Independent · Secondary
- Canberra Grammar School - Primary School Independent · Primary
Schools in O'malley
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Childcare | 9 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
O'Malley sits further from the CBD (14.2 km vs 10.2 km).
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 56/100 | 38/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 10.2 km | 14.2 km +39% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 19 min | 21 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 63/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 41.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 16.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 4.6% postcode 2603 | 3.4% postcode 2606 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 25 postcode 2603 | 20 postcode 2606 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.5%).
Setting
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 631 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 679 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 55/100 | 65/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 18% 1,535 premises | 36% 465 premises |
Climate
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 622 mm | 686 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.5°C | 28.2°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.8°C | 0.9°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ | 7.3 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 14.1 µg/m³ | 11.9 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | — | 0.32 pphm |
Council rates
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Canberra | Bean |
| Member | Alicia Payne | David Smith |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Red Hill | O'malley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Red Hill
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Red Hill
Other comparisons with O'malley
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.