Red Creek vs Woodchester
Red Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 43 in Woodchester. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Red Creek, most households are couple families. In Woodchester, about half of households are couple families. Woodchester is closer to the city centre: 52.2 km, against 59.4 km. On these figures, Red Creek tends to suit couples, while Woodchester suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Red Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (23/100 vs 49/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Red Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($225/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Woodchester
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (12/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (52.2 km vs 59.4 km)
- has a shorter drive in (51 min vs 58 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Woodchester
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (12/100 vs 0/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (20% vs 12%)
- But Red Creek carries lower crime risk (23/100 vs 49/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Red Creek and Woodchester drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Woodchester has more residents (253 vs 145); Red Creek has higher household incomes ($115,128 vs $98,748).
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 145 | 253 +74% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +17.9% | +13.5% |
| Median age | 39 | 43 |
| Median household income | $115,128/yr +14% vs other | $98,748/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $225/wk | $250/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,077,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 99% |
| Residential | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 429 across Alexandrina same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +25% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 89% of SA | Higher than 78% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 6% of SA | Higher than 66% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 64% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 45% of SA | Higher than 57% of SA |
Liveability
Woodchester is more walkable (12 vs 0).
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Red Creek carries more bushfire risk (57 vs 0); Woodchester carries more crime risk (49 vs 23).
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 57/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 23/100 | Moderate 49/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Red Creek sits further from the CBD (59.4 km vs 52.2 km).
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 12/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 59.4 km +12% vs other | 52.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 58 min | 51 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 5255 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 85 postcode 5255 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.7%).
Setting
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 154 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 83 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 44.1 km | 38.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 44 premises | 0% 95 premises |
Climate
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 466 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,523/yr same for both | |
| Council | Alexandrina same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Red Creek | Woodchester | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Red Creek
Woodchester
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Red Creek
Other comparisons with Woodchester
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.