Ravensdale vs Martinsville
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Martinsville: a median of $1.6 million, against $1.1 million in Ravensdale, though rent is higher in Ravensdale. On these figures, Ravensdale tends to suit people living alone, families with children, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Ravensdale carries lower crime risk (45/100 vs 62/100)
- Martinsville is already more of a family suburb (71% vs 62%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Ravensdale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,100,000 vs $1,600,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Martinsville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($347/wk vs $375/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Martinsville
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (8/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (99 min vs 135 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (124.5 km vs 137.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Ravensdale carries lower crime risk (45/100 vs 62/100)
- Martinsville is more walkable (8/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Ravensdale and Martinsville drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Martinsville has more residents (389 vs 70); Ravensdale has higher household incomes ($110,448 vs $94,692).
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70 | 389 +456% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.4% | +7.8% |
| Median age | 51 | 53 |
| Median household income | $110,448/yr +14% vs other | $94,692/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $375/wk +7% vs other | $347/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.7%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,100,000 | $1,600,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,625,000 |
Zoning mix
Ravensdale has more rural and farming land (75% vs 12%); Martinsville has more land zoned for conservation (88% vs 25%).
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 25% | 88% |
| Rural and farming | 75% | 12% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,441 across Central Coast (NSW) | 1,212 across Lake Macquarie |
| Approvals change year on year | +67% | +2% |
Ranking within NSW
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 75% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 10% of NSW | Higher than 54% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 30% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 66% of NSW | Higher than 75% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 24% of NSW | Higher than 33% of NSW |
Liveability
Martinsville is more walkable (8 vs 0).
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Martinsville carries more crime risk (62 vs 45).
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 56/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 45/100 | Moderate 62/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 8 | 15 |
Mobility
Ravensdale sits further from the CBD (137.7 km vs 124.5 km).
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 8/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 137.7 km +10% vs other | 124.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 135 min | 99 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2259 | 0.9% postcode 2265 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 2259 | 78 postcode 2265 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.3%).
Setting
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 294 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 28.2 km | 23.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 23/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 30 premises | 0% 95 premises |
Climate
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,272 mm | 804 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.4°C | 30.0°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 10.6°C | 5.1°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.1 µg/m³ | 5.0 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 14.8 µg/m³ | 11.6 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.36 pphm | 0.27 pphm |
Council rates
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,409/yr | $1,708/yr |
| Council | Central Coast (NSW) | Lake Macquarie |
Federal electorate
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dobell | Hunter |
| Member | Emma Mcbride | Dan Repacholi |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Ravensdale | Martinsville | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Ravensdale
Other comparisons with Martinsville
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.