Ransome vs Lota
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Ransome, most households are couple families. In Lota, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Ransome tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lota
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 2)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- But Ransome is already more of a family suburb (84% vs 68%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Ransome
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (17% vs 22%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Lota
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($415/wk vs $455/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Lota
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (57/100 vs 9/100)
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (7% vs 1%)
- But Ransome sits closer to the CBD (20.7 km vs 22.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lota
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (57/100 vs 9/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Ransome and Lota drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lota has more residents (3,518 vs 429); Ransome has higher household incomes ($164,632 vs $116,272).
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 429 | 3,518 +720% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.9% | +8.0% |
| Median age | 41 | 42 |
| Median household income | $164,632/yr +29% vs other | $116,272/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $455/wk +9% vs other | $415/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $1,308,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 24 days from 38 sales |
Development activity
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 9,382 across Brisbane same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +9% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.5% $780/wk on $1.18M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 98% of QLD | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 70% of QLD | Higher than 88% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 95% of QLD | Higher than 89% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 92% of QLD | Higher than 84% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 23% of QLD |
Liveability
Lota is more walkable (57 vs 9).
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | A |
| Score | — | 78/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 37/100 | Moderate 45/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Low 21/100 | Low 22/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Ransome
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Lota
- Lota State School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 9 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 5 | 2 |
Mobility
Lota sits further from the CBD (22.9 km vs 20.7 km).
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 9/100 | 57/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 20.7 km | 22.9 km +11% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 30 min | 33 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.2% postcode 4154 | 1.4% postcode 4179 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 84 postcode 4154 | 65 postcode 4179 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.1%).
Setting
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 9 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 6 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.7 km 3.4 km to a named beach | 286 m 1.2 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 81/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 67% 147 premises | 2% 1,444 premises |
Climate
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 3.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,519/yr same for both | |
| Council | Brisbane same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bonner same for both | |
| Member | Kara Cook same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Ransome | Lota | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Ransome
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Ransome
Other comparisons with Lota
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.