Ransome vs Chandler
Ransome is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 45 in Chandler. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Chandler is closer to the city centre: 17.4 km, against 20.7 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Ransome
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 73/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Ransome
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (17% vs 28%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Chandler
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($368/wk vs $455/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Chandler
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (17.4 km vs 20.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Ransome carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 73/100)
- Chandler has more residents already 65 and over (20% vs 13%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Ransome and Chandler drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Chandler has more residents (1,475 vs 429); Ransome rents higher ($455/wk vs $368/wk).
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 429 | 1,475 +244% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.9% | +2.3% |
| Median age | 41 | 45 |
| Median household income | $164,632/yr +8% vs other | $151,060/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $455/wk +19% vs other | $368/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $3,250,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $3,795,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 40 days from 8 sales |
Development activity
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 9,382 across Brisbane same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +9% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 98% of QLD | Higher than 97% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 70% of QLD | Higher than 71% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 95% of QLD | Higher than 94% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 92% of QLD | Higher than 75% of QLD |
Liveability
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 64/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Chandler carries more crime risk (73 vs 37).
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 37/100 | High 73/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Low 21/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 3 |
| Waterways | 5 | 4 |
Mobility
Ransome sits further from the CBD (20.7 km vs 17.4 km).
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 9/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 20.7 km +16% vs other | 17.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 30 min | 27 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.2% postcode 4154 | 2.0% postcode 4155 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 84 postcode 4154 | — postcode 4155 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.2%).
Setting
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 9 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 23 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.7 km 3.4 km to a named beach | 5.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 81/100 | 65/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 67% 147 premises | 36% 766 premises |
Climate
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 3.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,519/yr same for both | |
| Council | Brisbane same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bonner same for both | |
| Member | Kara Cook same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Ransome | Chandler | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Ransome
Chandler
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Ransome
Other comparisons with Chandler
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.