Quandary vs Gidginbung
Gidginbung is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 46 in Quandary. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Quandary tends to suit older residents, while Gidginbung suits people living alone and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Quandary
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 54/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (73% vs 64%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Gidginbung
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (39% vs 18%)
- has cheaper rent ($100/wk vs $125/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Quandary is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- Gidginbung sits closer to the CBD (440.2 km vs 445.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Quandary
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (23% vs 14%)
- carries lower crime risk (41/100 vs 54/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Quandary
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (29.5% vs 6.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Quandary and Gidginbung drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Quandary rents higher ($125/wk vs $100/wk); Quandary skews older (46 vs 38).
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57 | 69 +21% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +29.5% | +6.2% |
| Median age | 46 | 38 |
| Median household income | $94,224/yr same for both | |
| Median weekly rent | $125/wk +20% vs other | $100/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
Property market
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $825,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 51 across Temora same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -14% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 36% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 61% of NSW same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 6% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| EV adoption | — | Higher than 14% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 39% of NSW | Higher than 41% of NSW |
Liveability
Quandary is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Gidginbung carries more bushfire risk (18 vs 0); Gidginbung carries more crime risk (54 vs 41).
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 18/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 41/100 | Moderate 54/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 6 | 10 |
Mobility
Quandary sits further from the CBD (445.9 km vs 440.2 km).
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 445.9 km +1% vs other | 440.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 303 min | 301 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 2665 | 0.2% postcode 2666 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 2665 | 47 postcode 2666 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (84.6%).
Setting
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 262 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 261 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 27/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 27 premises | 0% 41 premises |
Climate
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 420 mm | 553 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 32.9°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 4.0°C |
Council rates
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $719/yr same for both | |
| Council | Temora same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Riverina same for both | |
| Member | Michael Mccormack same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Quandary | Gidginbung | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Quandary
Gidginbung
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Quandary
Other comparisons with Gidginbung
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.