Pyalong vs High Camp
Pyalong is the younger of the two, with a median age of 42 against 46 in High Camp. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Pyalong, about half of households are couple families. In High Camp, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Pyalong tends to suit families with children, while High Camp suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Pyalong
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Pyalong is more walkable (27/100 vs 0/100)
- High Camp sits closer to the CBD (90.9 km vs 96.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pyalong
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (27/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Pyalong and High Camp drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pyalong has more residents (772 vs 122); High Camp has higher household incomes ($108,316 vs $86,372).
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 772 +84% vs other | 122 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +17.0% | +13.0% |
| Median age | 42 | 46 |
| Median household income | $86,372/yr | $108,316/yr +25% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk | $300/wk +3% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $550,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $810,000 | — |
Zoning mix
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 97% | 96% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 3% |
| Residential | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,074 across Mitchell same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +70% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 56% of VIC | Higher than 80% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 82% of VIC | Higher than 53% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — | Higher than 34% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 66% of VIC | Higher than 67% of VIC |
Liveability
Pyalong is more walkable (27 vs 0).
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | — |
| Score | 51/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
High Camp carries more bushfire risk (73 vs 55).
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 55/100 | High 73/100 |
| Crime | Low 38/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Pyalong
- Pyalong Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in High Camp
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 5 | 3 |
Mobility
Pyalong sits further from the CBD (96.5 km vs 90.9 km).
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 27/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 96.5 km +6% vs other | 90.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 82 min | 80 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 3521 | 0.4% postcode 3764 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 61 postcode 3521 | 46 postcode 3764 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (70.8%).
Setting
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 284 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 413 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 322 premises | 0% 49 premises |
Climate
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 540 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,947/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mitchell same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bendigo | Nicholls |
| Member | Lisa Chesters | Sam Birrell |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | The Nationals |
First Home Owner Grant
| Pyalong | High Camp | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Pyalong
Other comparisons with High Camp
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.