Prospect vs Longford
Prospect is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 47 in Longford. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Prospect, about half of households are people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Longford
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 2)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (86% vs 72%)
- But Prospect has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Longford
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($494,000 vs $550,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Longford
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($265/wk vs $290/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Longford
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (38/100 vs 30/100)
- has a shorter drive in (133 min vs 150 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (185.9 km vs 203.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Prospect has more units and townhouses to downsize into (28% vs 14%)
- Longford is more walkable (38/100 vs 30/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Prospect and Longford drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Longford has more residents (4,268 vs 1,908); Longford skews older (47 vs 43).
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,908 | 4,268 +124% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +10.8% | +10.5% |
| Median age | 43 | 47 |
| Median household income | $64,116/yr +2% vs other | $63,024/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk +9% vs other | $265/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $642,500 | $621,500 |
| Median unit price | $550,000 | $494,000 |
| Median land price | — | $625,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 22 days from 17 sales | 24 days from 40 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
8 vs 15 sales
31 vs 62 sales
17 vs 25 sales
Zoning mix
Longford has more rural and farming land (96% vs 51%); Prospect has more land zoned for conservation (15% vs 0%).
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 51% | 96% |
| Environmental | 15% | 0% |
| Residential | 15% | 2% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 12% | 1% |
| Parks and recreation | 5% | 1% |
| Commercial | 2% | 0% |
| Other and special use | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 208 across Launceston | 184 across Northern Midlands |
| Approvals change year on year | -29% | +104% |
Gross rental yield
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.2% $600/wk on $745K | 4.2% $545/wk on $670K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 43% of TAS | Higher than 41% of TAS |
| Schools | Higher than 92% of TAS | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of TAS | Higher than 90% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 72% of TAS | Higher than 61% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 96% of TAS | Higher than 85% of TAS |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 50% of TAS | Higher than 52% of TAS |
Liveability
Prospect scores higher overall (67 vs 51); Longford is more walkable (38 vs 30).
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | B |
| Score | 67/100 | 51/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 20/100 | Low 23/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Launceston, 5.7 km | None |
Schools in Prospect
- Prospect High School Government · Secondary above peers
- St Patrick's College Catholic · Secondary above peers
- St Patrick’s College - Croagh Patrick Centre Catholic · Secondary
Schools in Longford
- Longford Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 9 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 4 |
Mobility
Prospect sits further from the CBD (203.2 km vs 185.9 km).
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 30/100 | 38/100 |
| Distance to Hobart | 203.2 km +9% vs other | 185.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 150 min | 133 min |
| Public transport score | 76/100 Bus | 36/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 40.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 8.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 7250 | 0.5% postcode 7301 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 25 postcode 7250 | 32 postcode 7301 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.1%).
Setting
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 116 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 151 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 | 68/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 1,024 premises | 45% 2,222 premises |
Climate
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 676 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,075/yr | $1,704/yr |
| Council | Launceston | Northern Midlands |
Federal electorate
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bass | Lyons |
| Member | Jess Teesdale | Rebecca White |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Prospect | Longford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Prospect
Other comparisons with Longford
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.