Prospect vs Kilburn
Kilburn is the younger of the two, with a median age of 34 against 37 in Prospect. In Prospect, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Kilburn, most households rent. Houses cost more in Prospect: a median of $1.31 million, against $910,000 in Kilburn, and rent is higher there too. Prospect is closer to the city centre: 5.3 km, against 8.8 km. On these figures, Kilburn tends to suit renters and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Prospect
ahead on 5 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (13 vs 2)
- has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (17 vs 6)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Kilburn
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($415,800 vs $800,000)
- has cheaper houses ($910,500 vs $1,310,000)
- has cheaper units ($474,000 vs $607,000)
- But Prospect leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 29%)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Kilburn
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (57% vs 36%)
- has cheaper rent ($270/wk vs $350/wk)
- But Prospect leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 23%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Prospect
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (5.3 km vs 8.8 km)
- is more walkable (91/100 vs 82/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Prospect
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 1)
- carries lower crime risk (79/100 vs 91/100)
- is more walkable (91/100 vs 82/100)
- But Kilburn has more units and townhouses to downsize into (54% vs 32%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Prospect is growing faster (9.8% vs 3.7%)
- Kilburn returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.4% vs 3.8%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Prospect and Kilburn drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Prospect has more residents (14,584 vs 5,633); Prospect has higher household incomes ($104,052 vs $61,308).
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,584 +61% vs other | 5,633 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.8% | +3.7% |
| Median age | 37 | 34 |
| Median household income | $104,052/yr +41% vs other | $61,308/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +23% vs other | $270/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,310,000 | $910,500 |
| Median unit price | $607,000 | $474,000 |
| Median land price | $800,000 | $415,800 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 19 days from 106 sales | 18 days from 26 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
29 vs 6 sales
104 vs 36 sales
54 vs 11 sales
Zoning mix
Prospect has more commercially zoned land (17% vs 2%).
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 79% | 83% |
| Commercial | 17% | 2% |
| Industrial | 2% | 12% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 203 across Prospect | 1,176 across Port Adelaide Enfield |
| Approvals change year on year | +757% | +23% |
Gross rental yield
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.8% $740/wk on $1.01M | 4.4% $610/wk on $720K |
| Units | 5.3% $595/wk on $588K | — |
Ranking within SA
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 80% of SA | Higher than 49% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 82% of SA | — |
| Schools | Higher than 64% of SA | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 99% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 32% of SA | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 87% of SA | Higher than 55% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 99% of SA | Higher than 84% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 42% of SA | Higher than 85% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 79% of SA | — |
Liveability
Prospect scores higher overall (70 vs 36); Prospect is more walkable (91 vs 82).
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | C |
| Score | 70/100 | 36/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Kilburn carries more crime risk (91 vs 79).
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 79/100 | High 91/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 69/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Moderate 50/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 27 within 5 km | 35 within 5 km |
Schools
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 6 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 5.2 km | 3 Adelaide University, Mawson Lakes Campus, 6.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.9% | 3.4% |
Schools in Prospect
- Blackfriars Priory School Catholic · Combined above peers
- Prospect Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Prescott College Independent · Secondary at peers
- Rosary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Prospect North Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Sports College South Australia - North Adelaide Football Club Independent · Secondary
Schools in Kilburn
- St Brigid's School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Youth Education Centre - Flexicentre Campus (Kilburn) Government · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 5 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 22 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 17 | 6 |
| Childcare | 13 | 2 |
| GPs | 4 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 4 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 8 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 3 same for both | |
Mobility
Kilburn sits further from the CBD (8.8 km vs 5.3 km).
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 91/100 | 82/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 5.3 km | 8.8 km +66% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 12 min | 16 min |
| Public transport score | 91/100 Rail · Bus | 87/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 299.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 113.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 5082 | 0.6% postcode 5084 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 50 postcode 5082 | 46 postcode 5084 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.2%).
Setting
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 39 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 10 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 9.2 km | 6.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 99/100 | 73/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 97% 7,328 premises | 51% 2,854 premises |
Climate
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.51 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,363/yr | $1,311/yr |
| Council | Prospect | Port Adelaide Enfield |
Federal electorate
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Adelaide same for both | |
| Member | Steve Georganas same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Prospect | Kilburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Prospect
Kilburn
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Prospect
Other comparisons with Kilburn
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.