Prospect vs Horsley Park
Prospect is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 45 in Horsley Park. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Horsley Park: a median of $3.8 million, against $1.23 million in Prospect. Prospect is closer to the city centre: 34.1 km, against 42.3 km. On these figures, Prospect tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Prospect has more parks and reserves (6 vs 2)
- Horsley Park has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Prospect
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($1,230,500 vs $3,800,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (24% vs 35%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Prospect sits closer to the CBD (34.1 km vs 42.3 km)
- Horsley Park is more walkable (60/100 vs 4/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Prospect has more units and townhouses to downsize into (16% vs 3%)
- Horsley Park is more walkable (60/100 vs 4/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Prospect
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.0% vs -2.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Prospect and Horsley Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Prospect has more residents (5,187 vs 1,790); Horsley Park skews older (45 vs 38).
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,187 +65% vs other | 1,790 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +10.0% | -2.6% |
| Median age | 38 | 45 |
| Median household income | $108,368/yr | $111,020/yr +2% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $435/wk +2% vs other | $428/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.8%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,230,500 | $3,800,000 |
| Median unit price | $516,250 | — |
| Median land price | $1,475,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 35 sales | 91 days from 7 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
39 vs 5 sales
25 vs 5 sales
Zoning mix
Horsley Park has more rural and farming land (46% vs 1%).
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 50% | 0% |
| Rural and farming | 1% | 46% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 19% | 3% |
| Industrial | 15% same for both | |
| Parks and recreation | 11% | 0% |
| Environmental | 3% | 1% |
| Commercial | 1% | 0% |
| Planning zones cover 100% of Prospect and 66% of Horsley Park. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,325 across Blacktown | 1,095 across Fairfield |
| Approvals change year on year | -18% | +29% |
Gross rental yield
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.7% $825/wk on $750K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 61% of NSW | Higher than 96% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 74% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 45% of NSW | Higher than 84% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 5% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 71% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 98% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Horsley Park is more walkable (60 vs 4).
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 52/100 | 55/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Horsley Park carries more bushfire risk (74 vs 19); Horsley Park carries more crime risk (72 vs 54).
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 19/100 | High 74/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 54/100 | High 72/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 | High 70/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 25 within 5 km | 15 within 5 km |
Schools
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Western Sydney University - Parramatta, 9.9 km | None |
Schools in Prospect
- Ebenezer Christian College Independent · Combined at peers
Schools in Horsley Park
- Marion Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- St Narsai Assyrian Christian College Independent · Secondary above peers
- Horsley Park Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 same for both | |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 2 |
| Childcare | 3 same for both | |
| GPs | 2 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 2 |
| Waterways | 0 | 29 |
Mobility
Horsley Park sits further from the CBD (42.3 km vs 34.1 km).
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 4/100 | 60/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 34.1 km | 42.3 km +24% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 39 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 67/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 72.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 50.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 2148 | 0.6% postcode 2175 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 35 postcode 2148 | 59 postcode 2175 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (54.8%).
Setting
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 57 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 79 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 28.8 km | 31.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 96/100 | 85/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 84% 2,051 premises | 59% 804 premises |
Climate
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 931 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.88 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,157/yr | $990/yr |
| Council | Blacktown | Fairfield |
Federal electorate
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mcmahon same for both | |
| Member | Chris Bowen same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Prospect | Horsley Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Prospect
Horsley Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Prospect
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.