Port Sorell vs Squeaking Point

Squeaking Point is the younger of the two, with a median age of 45 against 52 in Port Sorell. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Squeaking Point, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Squeaking Point: a median of $832,000, against $750,000 in Port Sorell, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Port Sorell tends to suit older residents, while Squeaking Point suits couples.

Which one suits you?

There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.

Families with school-age kids

They split

one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here

  • Port Sorell has more parks and reserves (6 vs 0)
  • Squeaking Point has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 90%)

Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.

First-home buyers

Port Sorell

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • has cheaper houses ($750,000 vs $832,500)

Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.

Renters

Port Sorell

ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here

  • has a bigger rental market to choose from (20% vs 6%)
  • has cheaper rent ($275/wk vs $330/wk)

Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.

Commuting to the city

They split

one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here

  • Port Sorell is more walkable (19/100 vs 0/100)
  • Squeaking Point sits closer to the CBD (275 km vs 277.2 km)

Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.

Downsizers and retirees

Port Sorell

ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here

  • is more walkable (19/100 vs 0/100)
  • has more residents already 65 and over (28% vs 17%)

Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.

Investors

Squeaking Point

ahead on the one thing that separates them

  • is growing faster (51.1% vs 9.8%)

Weighs population growth.

Where they sit

Port Sorell and Squeaking Point drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Hides rows where both suburbs match

Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.

Side by side, out of 100

Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Walkability 19 / 0
Port Sorell — Walkability: 19/100 Squeaking Point — Walkability: 0/100
Low fire risk 84 / 100
Port Sorell — Low fire risk: 84/100 Squeaking Point — Low fire risk: 100/100

Demographics

Port Sorell has more residents (2,221 vs 337); Squeaking Point rents higher ($330/wk vs $275/wk).

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Population 2,221
+85% vs other
337
Population trend (2016 → 2021) +9.8% +51.1%
Median age 52 45
Median household income $67,600/yr $75,348/yr
+11% vs other
Median weekly rent $275/wk $330/wk
+20% vs other

Age profile

Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
0-4 5.3% / 4.2%
Port Sorell — 0-4: 5.3% Squeaking Point — 0-4: 4.2%
5-14 9.9% / 14.2%
Port Sorell — 5-14: 9.9% Squeaking Point — 5-14: 14.2%
15-19 4.3% / 4.7%
Port Sorell — 15-19: 4.3% Squeaking Point — 15-19: 4.7%
20-24 3.8% / 4.7%
Port Sorell — 20-24: 3.8% Squeaking Point — 20-24: 4.7%
25-34 8.5% / 7.4%
Port Sorell — 25-34: 8.5% Squeaking Point — 25-34: 7.4%
35-44 9.1% / 12.5%
Port Sorell — 35-44: 9.1% Squeaking Point — 35-44: 12.5%
45-54 14.0% / 12.2%
Port Sorell — 45-54: 14.0% Squeaking Point — 45-54: 12.2%
55-64 17.8% / 19.6%
Port Sorell — 55-64: 17.8% Squeaking Point — 55-64: 19.6%
65-74 17.8% / 12.8%
Port Sorell — 65-74: 17.8% Squeaking Point — 65-74: 12.8%
75-84 8.4% / 3.9%
Port Sorell — 75-84: 8.4% Squeaking Point — 75-84: 3.9%
85+ 1.3% / —
Port Sorell — 85+: 1.3% Squeaking Point — 85+: not among its largest

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.6%).

Who lives together

Household composition, 2021 Census.

Port Sorell 39.7% couple families
Port Sorell — Couple Families: 39.7% Port Sorell — Lone Person: 39.9% Port Sorell — One Parent Families: 15.5% Port Sorell — Group Household: 3.3% Port Sorell — Other Families: 1.5%
Squeaking Point 53.7% couple families
Squeaking Point — Couple Families: 53.7% Squeaking Point — Lone Person: 32.9% Squeaking Point — One Parent Families: 4.9% Squeaking Point — Group Household: 3.7% Squeaking Point — Other Families: 4.9%
Couple Families Lone Person One Parent Families Group Household Other Families

Who owns and who rents

Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.

Port Sorell 20.3% renting
Port Sorell — Owned Outright: 46.5% Port Sorell — Mortgage: 33.2% Port Sorell — Renting: 20.3%
Squeaking Point 6.0% renting
Squeaking Point — Owned Outright: 49.6% Squeaking Point — Mortgage: 44.4% Squeaking Point — Renting: 6.0%
Owned outright Mortgage Renting

Qualifications

Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Certificate III & IV 21.1% / 20.2%
Port Sorell — Certificate III & IV: 21.1% Squeaking Point — Certificate III & IV: 20.2%
Bachelor Degree 8.9% / 6.8%
Port Sorell — Bachelor Degree: 8.9% Squeaking Point — Bachelor Degree: 6.8%
Advanced Diploma / Diploma 6.0% / 4.5%
Port Sorell — Advanced Diploma / Diploma: 6.0% Squeaking Point — Advanced Diploma / Diploma: 4.5%
Postgraduate Degree 2.3% / 2.7%
Port Sorell — Postgraduate Degree: 2.3% Squeaking Point — Postgraduate Degree: 2.7%
Graduate Diploma / Certificate 1.3% / 0.9%
Port Sorell — Graduate Diploma / Certificate: 1.3% Squeaking Point — Graduate Diploma / Certificate: 0.9%

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).

Where residents were born

Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
England 4.7% / 4.5%
Port Sorell — England: 4.7% Squeaking Point — England: 4.5%
New Zealand 1.3% / 2.4%
Port Sorell — New Zealand: 1.3% Squeaking Point — New Zealand: 2.4%
Scotland 0.7% / 1.2%
Port Sorell — Scotland: 0.7% Squeaking Point — Scotland: 1.2%
Germany 0.3% / 1.2%
Port Sorell — Germany: 0.3% Squeaking Point — Germany: 1.2%
Netherlands 0.9% / —
Port Sorell — Netherlands: 0.9% Squeaking Point — Netherlands: not among its largest
Bangladesh — / 0.9%
Port Sorell — Bangladesh: not among its largest Squeaking Point — Bangladesh: 0.9%
India 0.5% / —
Port Sorell — India: 0.5% Squeaking Point — India: not among its largest

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.7%).

What people live in

Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.

Port Sorell 89.6% houses
Port Sorell — Houses: 89.6% Port Sorell — Flats / Apartments: 5.8% Port Sorell — Townhouses: 4.6%
Squeaking Point 100.0% houses
Squeaking Point — Houses: 100.0% Squeaking Point — Flats / Apartments: 0.0% Squeaking Point — Townhouses: 0.0%
Houses Flats / Apartments Townhouses

Property market

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Median house price $750,000 $832,500
Median unit price $515,000 —
Median land price $350,000 —
Typical days to sell (houses) 31 days
from 25 sales
—

Zoning mix

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Rural and farming 76% 84%
Environmental 7% 16%
Residential 8% 0%
Other and special use 5% 0%
Infrastructure and transport 4% 0%
Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09.

Development activity

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
New dwellings approved 93
across Latrobe (Tas.)
same for both
Approvals change year on year +9%
same for both

Gross rental yield

Gross — before strata, rates, management, insurance and vacancy. From median advertised rents and median asking prices over the last 6 months. How we calculate.

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Houses 3.4%
$580/wk on $895K
—
Units 5.2%
$512/wk on $514K
—

Ranking within TAS

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
House price —
same for both
Income Higher than 48% of TAS Higher than 65% of TAS
Schools —
same for both
Walkability Higher than 84% of TAS Higher than 6% of TAS
Affordability —
same for both
EV adoption Higher than 52% of TAS
same for both
NBN connectivity Higher than 80% of TAS Higher than 73% of TAS
Rental yield (houses) Higher than 16% of TAS —
Rental yield (units) Higher than 75% of TAS —

Liveability

Port Sorell is more walkable (19 vs 0).

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Grade B —
Score 52/100 —
Socio-economic band below-average income
decile 3/10
same for both

Risk profile

Port Sorell carries more bushfire risk (16 vs 0).

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Bushfire Low
16/100
None
0/100
Crime Not mapped
no mapped data here
same for both
Flood Not mapped
no mapped data here
same for both
Coastal erosion None
0/100
same for both
Aircraft noise None
0/100
same for both
Industrial facilities nearby 1
within 5 km
0
within 5 km

Schools

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Inside the suburb 1 0
Rated above peers 0
same for both
Rated at peers 0
same for both
Rated below peers 1 0

Schools in Port Sorell

  • Port Sorell Primary School Government · Primary below peers

Schools in Squeaking Point

No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.

Amenities in the suburb

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Cafes & restaurants 1 0
Parks & reserves 6 0
Childcare 1 0

Mobility

Port Sorell sits further from the CBD (277.2 km vs 275 km).

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Walkability score 19/100 0/100
Distance to Hobart 277.2 km 275 km
Drive time (normal traffic) 194 min 192 min
Electric vehicle share 0.5%
postcode 7307
same for both
Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings 30
postcode 7307
same for both

How people get to work

Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Car (driver) 85.5% / 85.4%
Port Sorell — Car (driver): 85.5% Squeaking Point — Car (driver): 85.4%
Worked from Home 7.5% / 10.0%
Port Sorell — Worked from Home: 7.5% Squeaking Point — Worked from Home: 10.0%
Car (passenger) 5.2% / 2.3%
Port Sorell — Car (passenger): 5.2% Squeaking Point — Car (passenger): 2.3%
Walked Only 0.8% / 2.3%
Port Sorell — Walked Only: 0.8% Squeaking Point — Walked Only: 2.3%
Bus 0.9% / —
Port Sorell — Bus: 0.9% Squeaking Point — Bus: not among its largest

Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (85.5%).

Setting

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Elevation 34 m
above sea level, at the suburb centre
15 m
above sea level, at the suburb centre
Distance to the ocean 1.7 km
1.7 km to a named beach
2.5 km
3.2 km to a named beach

NBN connectivity

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Connectivity score 60/100 39/100
Most common technology Fibre to the node Fixed wireless
Full-fibre (FTTP) share 28%
1,141 premises
11%
177 premises

Climate

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Annual rainfall 698 mm
same for both
Summer max (Jan) 21.6°C
same for both
Winter min (Jul) 5.1°C
same for both

Council rates

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Average residential rate $1,123/yr
same for both
Council Latrobe (Tas.)
same for both

Federal electorate

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Division Braddon
same for both
Member Anne Urquhart
same for both
Party Australian Labor Party
same for both

First Home Owner Grant

Port Sorell Squeaking Point
Grant amount $20,000
same for both
Property price cap —
same for both
Eligibility New
same for both

Tags

Port Sorell

Squeaking Point

More comparisons

Other comparisons with Port Sorell

Other comparisons with Squeaking Point

Full data on Port Sorell Full data on Squeaking Point
Unlock full address-level data — $29/month

Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.

Save this page for later

We'll email you a link to this page so you can finish reading it on any device. We use your address once to send it and don't keep it.

or