Port Noarlunga South vs Seaford
Port Noarlunga South is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 43 in Seaford. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. On these figures, Seaford tends to suit people living alone.
Port Noarlunga South and Seaford are neighbouring coastal suburbs with similar distances to Adelaide's CBD. Port Noarlunga South has a notably higher median household income at $79,560 compared to Seaford's $65,208, and significantly lower crime risk at 57 versus 86. Seaford, however, scores much higher on walkability (79 versus 38) and liveability (39 versus 27), making it better suited to those prioritising urban amenity and foot traffic. Seaford also has zero bushfire risk, while Port Noarlunga South rates 37, and offers a slightly better rental yield at 4.3 percent.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Port Noarlunga South has more parks and reserves (5 vs 1)
- Seaford has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Port Noarlunga South
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($650,000 vs $1,357,970)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Seaford
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (79/100 vs 38/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Seaford
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (79/100 vs 38/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 19%)
- But Port Noarlunga South carries lower crime risk (57/100 vs 86/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Port Noarlunga South and Seaford drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Seaford has more residents (4,493 vs 3,058); Port Noarlunga South has higher household incomes ($79,560 vs $65,208).
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,058 | 4,493 +47% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | — | +1.1% |
| Median age | 39 | 43 |
| Median household income | $79,560/yr +18% vs other | $65,208/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +6% vs other | $330/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $905,000 | $880,000 |
| Median unit price | $697,000 | — |
| Median land price | $650,000 | $1,357,970 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 36 sales | 21 days from 41 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
78 vs 67 sales
38 vs 17 sales
Zoning mix
Port Noarlunga South has more land zoned for conservation (59% vs 6%); Seaford has more commercially zoned land (17% vs 0%).
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 38% | 65% |
| Environmental | 59% | 6% |
| Commercial | 0% | 17% |
| Industrial | 0% | 13% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,367 across Onkaparinga same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +58% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $690/wk on $912K | 4.2% $682/wk on $844K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 34% of SA | Higher than 25% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 54% of SA | Higher than 33% of SA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 8% of SA |
| Walkability | Higher than 77% of SA | Higher than 91% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 67% of SA | Higher than 51% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 78% of SA | Higher than 74% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 100% of SA | Higher than 98% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 51% of SA | Higher than 72% of SA |
Liveability
Seaford is more walkable (79 vs 38); Seaford scores higher overall (39 vs 27).
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | C |
| Score | 27/100 | 39/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Port Noarlunga South carries more bushfire risk (37 vs 0); Seaford carries more crime risk (86 vs 57).
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 37/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | High 86/100 |
| Flood | High 90/100 | — |
| Coastal erosion | Low 37/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Port Noarlunga South
- South Port Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Seaford
- Moana Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Seaford Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
- All Saints Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 8 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 3 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
Mobility
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 38/100 | 79/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 36.5 km | 36.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 38 min | 37 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Rail · Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 63.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 119.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.0% postcode 5167 | 0.9% postcode 5169 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 70 postcode 5167 | 73 postcode 5169 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.9%).
Setting
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 22 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 26 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 397 m | 885 m 3.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 | 97/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 1,377 premises | 92% 2,374 premises |
Climate
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm | 786 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C | — |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 19.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.34 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,008/yr same for both | |
| Council | Onkaparinga same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kingston same for both | |
| Member | Amanda Rishworth same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Port Noarlunga South | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Port Noarlunga South
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Port Noarlunga South
Other comparisons with Seaford
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.