Pleasure Point vs Picnic Point
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Pleasure Point: a median of $2.12 million, against $1.73 million in Picnic Point, though rent is higher in Picnic Point. Picnic Point is closer to the city centre: 33.6 km, against 41.1 km. On these figures, Pleasure Point tends to suit couples, while Picnic Point suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Picnic Point
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 1)
- has more childcare (4 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- But Pleasure Point has more separate houses rather than flats (95% vs 75%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Pleasure Point leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 26%)
- Picnic Point has cheaper houses ($1,725,000 vs $2,125,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Pleasure Point
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 24%)
- has cheaper rent ($500/wk vs $580/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Picnic Point
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (33.6 km vs 41.1 km)
- is more walkable (69/100 vs 61/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Picnic Point
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (25% vs 5%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (16% vs 11%)
- is more walkable (69/100 vs 61/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Pleasure Point
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (14.8% vs 4.1%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Pleasure Point and Picnic Point drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Picnic Point has more residents (6,413 vs 606); Pleasure Point has higher household incomes ($170,352 vs $127,868).
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 606 | 6,413 +958% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +14.8% | +4.1% |
| Median age | 39 same for both | |
| Median household income | $170,352/yr +25% vs other | $127,868/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $500/wk | $580/wk +16% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,125,000 | $1,725,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $1,287,500 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 24 days from 56 sales |
Zoning mix
Picnic Point has more land zoned for conservation (45% vs 21%).
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 21% | 45% |
| Residential | 37% | 41% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 38% | 10% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 4% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,229 across Liverpool | 1,785 across Canterbury-Bankstown |
| Approvals change year on year | +28% | +50% |
Gross rental yield
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.8% $1,050/wk on $1.43M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 88% of NSW | Higher than 80% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 98% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 85% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 40% of NSW | Higher than 43% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 92% of NSW | Higher than 86% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 70% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 64% of NSW |
Liveability
Picnic Point is more walkable (69 vs 61).
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 96/100 | High 88/100 |
| Crime | Low 20/100 | Low 28/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 8 within 5 km |
Schools
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Western Sydney University - Bankstown City, 7.0 km | 1 Western Sydney University - Bankstown City, 6.4 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.0% | 2.7% |
Schools in Pleasure Point
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Picnic Point
- Picnic Point Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Picnic Point High School Government · Secondary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 9 |
| Childcare | 0 | 4 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 2 | 5 |
Mobility
Pleasure Point sits further from the CBD (41.1 km vs 33.6 km).
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 61/100 | 69/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 41.1 km +18% vs other | 33.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 40 min | 37 min |
| Public transport score | 23/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 4.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 40.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.9% postcode 2172 | 1.3% postcode 2213 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 63 postcode 2172 | 35 postcode 2213 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.7%).
Setting
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 28 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 18 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 13.9 km | 11.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 59/100 | 92/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 26% 191 premises | 60% 2,365 premises |
Climate
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 909 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.4°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,322/yr same for both | |
| Council | Liverpool | Canterbury-Bankstown |
Federal electorate
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hughes | Banks |
| Member | David Moncrieff | Zhi Soon |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Pleasure Point | Picnic Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Pleasure Point
Other comparisons with Picnic Point
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.