Pine Lodge vs Katandra
Pine Lodge is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 48 in Katandra. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Pine Lodge, most households are couple families. In Katandra, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Pine Lodge tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Pine Lodge
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (32/100 vs 56/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Pine Lodge
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (17% vs 25%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Katandra
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($170/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Pine Lodge
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (145 min vs 155 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (206.8 km vs 219.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pine Lodge
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (32/100 vs 56/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Pine Lodge and Katandra drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pine Lodge has more residents (267 vs 120); Pine Lodge has higher household incomes ($94,224 vs $58,500).
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 267 +55% vs other | 120 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +10.8% | +6.2% |
| Median age | 38 | 48 |
| Median household income | $94,224/yr +38% vs other | $58,500/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk +32% vs other | $170/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Zoning mix
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 100% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 649 across Greater Shepparton same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -23% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 64% of VIC | Higher than 18% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 23% of VIC | Higher than 34% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 41% of VIC | Higher than 18% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 56% of VIC | Higher than 59% of VIC |
Liveability
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Katandra carries more bushfire risk (33 vs 0); Katandra carries more crime risk (56 vs 32).
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 33/100 |
| Crime | Low 32/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Flood | High 98/100 | High 71/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 6 | 2 |
Mobility
Katandra sits further from the CBD (219.5 km vs 206.8 km).
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 206.8 km | 219.5 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 145 min | 155 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 3631 | 0.3% postcode 3634 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 70 postcode 3631 | 64 postcode 3634 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.2%).
Setting
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 120 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 126 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 114 premises | 0% 58 premises |
Climate
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 484 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,449/yr same for both | |
| Council | Greater Shepparton same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Nicholls same for both | |
| Member | Sam Birrell same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Pine Lodge | Katandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Pine Lodge
Other comparisons with Katandra
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.