Picton vs Razorback
Picton is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 43 in Razorback. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Picton, about half of households are couple families. In Razorback, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Razorback: a median of $2.27 million, against $1.2 million in Picton, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Picton tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Razorback suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Picton
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (10 vs 0)
- has more childcare (9 vs 1)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
- But Razorback is already more of a family suburb (80% vs 69%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Picton
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($1,200,000 vs $2,267,500)
- has cheaper land ($1,612,500 vs $1,860,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Picton
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (20% vs 8%)
- has cheaper rent ($375/wk vs $445/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Razorback
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (77.4 km vs 88.5 km)
- has a shorter drive in (66 min vs 73 min)
- But Picton is more walkable (65/100 vs 12/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Picton
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (65/100 vs 12/100)
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Picton and Razorback drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Picton has more residents (5,282 vs 1,174); Razorback has higher household incomes ($141,960 vs $113,412).
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,282 +78% vs other | 1,174 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.7% | +8.5% |
| Median age | 38 | 43 |
| Median household income | $113,412/yr | $141,960/yr +25% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $375/wk | $445/wk +19% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,200,000 | $2,267,500 |
| Median unit price | $510,000 | — |
| Median land price | $1,612,500 | $1,860,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 37 days from 51 sales | 50 days from 9 sales |
Zoning mix
Razorback has more land zoned for conservation (20% vs 3%).
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 83% | 77% |
| Environmental | 3% | 20% |
| Residential | 7% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 2% |
| Industrial | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,338 across Wollondilly same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +92% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.9% $775/wk on $1.39M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 63% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 78% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 65% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 60% of NSW | Higher than 19% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 77% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 51% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 18% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Picton is more walkable (65 vs 12); Picton scores higher overall (65 vs 58).
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Razorback carries more bushfire risk (27 vs 14).
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 14/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 53/100 | Moderate 46/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Picton
- St Anthony's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Picton High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Picton Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Razorback
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 0 |
| Childcare | 9 | 1 |
| GPs | 2 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 5 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 9 | 3 |
Mobility
Picton sits further from the CBD (88.5 km vs 77.4 km).
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 65/100 | 12/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 88.5 km +13% vs other | 77.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 73 min | 66 min |
| Public transport score | 75/100 Rail · Bus | 29/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 60.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 8.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 2 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 2571 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 75 postcode 2571 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.3%).
Setting
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 189 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 292 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 34.0 km | 31.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 40% 2,552 premises | 0% 389 premises |
Climate
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 817 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.8 µg/m³ | 5.1 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 12.1 µg/m³ | 13.2 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.11 pphm | 0.37 pphm |
Council rates
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,099/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wollondilly same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hume same for both | |
| Member | Angus Taylor same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Picton | Razorback | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Picton
Other comparisons with Razorback
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.