Peak Crossing vs South Ripley
South Ripley is the younger of the two, with a median age of 27 against 41 in Peak Crossing. In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses and most households are couple families. In Peak Crossing, the large majority of households own their home. In South Ripley, about half of households rent. Houses cost more in South Ripley: a median of $900,000, against $805,000 in Peak Crossing, and rent is higher there too. South Ripley is closer to the city centre: 46.1 km, against 59.1 km. On these figures, South Ripley tends to suit renters, young adults, and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Peak Crossing
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (12 vs 6)
- carries lower crime risk (55/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Peak Crossing
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($805,000 vs $900,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Peak Crossing has cheaper rent ($290/wk vs $390/wk)
- South Ripley has a bigger rental market to choose from (46% vs 18%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
South Ripley
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (46.1 km vs 59.1 km)
- has a shorter drive in (43 min vs 54 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Peak Crossing
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (16% vs 3%)
- carries lower crime risk (55/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
South Ripley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (471.5% vs 5.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Peak Crossing and South Ripley drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
South Ripley has more residents (4,069 vs 1,016); Peak Crossing skews older (41 vs 27).
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,016 | 4,069 +300% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.3% | +471.5% |
| Median age | 41 | 27 |
| Median household income | $94,952/yr | $113,464/yr +19% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk | $390/wk +34% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $805,000 | $900,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $759,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 20 days from 4 sales | 23 days from 131 sales |
Development activity
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 524 across Scenic Rim | 3,476 across Ipswich |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% | -7% |
Gross rental yield
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.6% $650/wk on $939K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 68% of QLD | Higher than 84% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 54% of QLD | Higher than 46% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 87% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 63% of QLD | Higher than 98% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 30% of QLD |
Liveability
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 36/100 | 38/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
South Ripley carries more bushfire risk (49 vs 38); South Ripley carries more crime risk (68 vs 55).
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 38/100 | Moderate 49/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 55/100 | Moderate 68/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Moderate 50/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Peak Crossing
- Peak Crossing State School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in South Ripley
- Ripley Valley State Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
- Ripley Valley State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 6 |
| Childcare | 2 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 7 | 3 |
Mobility
Peak Crossing sits further from the CBD (59.1 km vs 46.1 km).
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 59.1 km +22% vs other | 46.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 54 min | 43 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 4306 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.3%).
Setting
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 61 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 68 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 99/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 396 premises | 99% 2,279 premises |
Climate
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 897 mm | — |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.3°C | — |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.1°C | — |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ | 6.8 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ | 20.4 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm | 0.64 pphm |
Council rates
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,689/yr | $1,713/yr |
| Council | Scenic Rim | Ipswich |
Federal electorate
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright | Blair |
| Member | Scott Buchholz | Shayne Neumann |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland | Australian Labor Party |
First Home Owner Grant
| Peak Crossing | South Ripley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Peak Crossing
Other comparisons with South Ripley
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.