Peak Crossing vs Mutdapilly
Peak Crossing is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 44 in Mutdapilly. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Peak Crossing tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Peak Crossing has more parks and reserves (12 vs 0)
- Mutdapilly has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Peak Crossing
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 29%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Peak Crossing
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (59.1 km vs 61.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mutdapilly
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 55/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Peak Crossing
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.3% vs 0.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Peak Crossing and Mutdapilly drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Peak Crossing has more residents (1,016 vs 308); Peak Crossing has higher household incomes ($94,952 vs $82,836).
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,016 +70% vs other | 308 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.3% | +0.0% |
| Median age | 41 | 44 |
| Median household income | $94,952/yr +13% vs other | $82,836/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk | $300/wk +3% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $805,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 20 days from 4 sales | — |
Development activity
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 524 across Scenic Rim same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 68% of QLD | Higher than 54% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 54% of QLD | Higher than 20% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 87% of QLD | Higher than 66% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 63% of QLD | Higher than 53% of QLD |
Liveability
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 36/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Peak Crossing carries more bushfire risk (38 vs 0); Peak Crossing carries more crime risk (55 vs 29).
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 38/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 55/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Moderate 50/100 | Low 14/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Peak Crossing
- Peak Crossing State School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Mutdapilly
- Mutdapilly State School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 0 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 7 | 2 |
Mobility
Mutdapilly sits further from the CBD (61.1 km vs 59.1 km).
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 59.1 km | 61.1 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 54 min | 52 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 4306 | 0.6% postcode 4307 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | — postcode 4306 | 93 postcode 4307 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.3%).
Setting
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 61 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 68 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 396 premises | 0% 126 premises |
Climate
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 897 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,689/yr same for both | |
| Council | Scenic Rim same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright same for both | |
| Member | Scott Buchholz same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Peak Crossing | Mutdapilly | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Peak Crossing
Other comparisons with Mutdapilly
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.