Peacock Siding vs Upper Stone
Peacock Siding is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 51 in Upper Stone. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Peacock Siding, the large majority of households are couple families. In Upper Stone, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Peacock Siding tends to suit families with children and couples, while Upper Stone suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Peacock Siding is already more of a family suburb (79% vs 52%)
- Upper Stone carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 48/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Peacock Siding
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (16% vs 21%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Upper Stone
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($234/wk vs $355/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Peacock Siding
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (1013 min vs 1039 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (1484.5 km vs 1503.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Upper Stone
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 48/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (29% vs 7%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Upper Stone
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (27.6% vs -9.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Peacock Siding and Upper Stone drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Peacock Siding rents higher ($355/wk vs $234/wk); Peacock Siding has higher household incomes ($100,724 vs $71,500).
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 85 | 111 +31% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -9.6% | +27.6% |
| Median age | 41 | 51 |
| Median household income | $100,724/yr +29% vs other | $71,500/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $355/wk +34% vs other | $234/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Development activity
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 23 across Hinchinbrook same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -86% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 75% of QLD | Higher than 39% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 57% of QLD | Higher than 7% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 5% of QLD | Higher than 4% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 46% of QLD | Higher than 24% of QLD |
Liveability
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Upper Stone carries more bushfire risk (51 vs 0); Peacock Siding carries more crime risk (48 vs 11).
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 51/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 48/100 | Low 11/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 0 | 30 |
Mobility
Upper Stone sits further from the CBD (1503.1 km vs 1484.5 km).
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 1484.5 km | 1503.1 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 1013 min | 1039 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 4850 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 51 postcode 4850 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (84.0%).
Setting
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 36 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 83 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 27.9 km | 32.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 17/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 32 premises | 0% 38 premises |
Climate
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 2,433 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 14.8°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,516/yr same for both | |
| Council | Hinchinbrook same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kennedy same for both | |
| Member | Bob Katter same for both | |
| Party | Katter's Australian Party (KAP) same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Peacock Siding | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Peacock Siding
Other comparisons with Upper Stone
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.