Paynesville vs Metung
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Paynesville, most households are people living alone. In Metung, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Metung: a median of $642,000, against $550,000 in Paynesville, and rent is higher there too.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Metung
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 51/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (45% vs 36%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (97% vs 86%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Paynesville has cheaper houses ($550,000 vs $642,500)
- Metung has cheaper units ($345,000 vs $423,750)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Paynesville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($310/wk vs $346/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Paynesville
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (31/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (215 min vs 234 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (293.2 km vs 312 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Paynesville
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (31/100 vs 0/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (14% vs 3%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (46% vs 38%)
- But Metung carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 51/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Paynesville and Metung drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Paynesville has more residents (3,636 vs 1,899); Metung has higher household incomes ($63,388 vs $51,324).
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,636 +48% vs other | 1,899 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.5% | — |
| Median age | 62 | 60 |
| Median household income | $51,324/yr | $63,388/yr +24% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $310/wk | $346/wk +12% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $550,000 | $642,500 |
| Median unit price | $423,750 | $345,000 |
| Median land price | $209,000 | $222,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 44 days from 72 sales | 69 days from 35 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
16 vs 10 sales
118 vs 42 sales
55 vs 18 sales
Zoning mix
Metung has more rural and farming land (47% vs 0%).
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 56% | 22% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 47% |
| Parks and recreation | 40% | 23% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 7% |
| Environmental | 0% | 1% |
| Commercial | 1% | 0% |
| Industrial | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 386 across East Gippsland same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +50% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.8% $535/wk on $728K | 4.2% $625/wk on $780K |
| Units | 4.5% $418/wk on $485K | — |
Ranking within VIC
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 16% of VIC | Higher than 30% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 11% of VIC | Higher than 24% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 4% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 41% of VIC | Higher than 42% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 35% of VIC | Higher than 68% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 89% of VIC | Higher than 75% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 56% of VIC | Higher than 78% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 31% of VIC | — |
Liveability
Paynesville is more walkable (31 vs 0).
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 33/100 | 37/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Metung carries more bushfire risk (12 vs 0); Paynesville carries more crime risk (51 vs 31).
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 12/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 51/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Flood | High 85/100 | High 80/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Paynesville
- Paynesville Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Metung
- Metung Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 9 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 same for both | |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
Metung sits further from the CBD (312 km vs 293.2 km).
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 31/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 293.2 km | 312 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 215 min | 234 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 3880 | 0.8% postcode 3904 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 45 postcode 3880 | 48 postcode 3904 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.3%).
Setting
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 16 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 0 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.8 km 4.5 km to a named beach | 7.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 79/100 | 59/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 50% 2,626 premises | 33% 1,431 premises |
Climate
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 620 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.5°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,807/yr same for both | |
| Council | East Gippsland same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gippsland same for both | |
| Member | Darren Chester same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Paynesville | Metung | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Paynesville
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Paynesville
Other comparisons with Metung
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.