Patterson Lakes vs Seaford
Seaford is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 46 in Patterson Lakes. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Patterson Lakes, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Patterson Lakes: a median of $1.34 million, against $870,000 in Seaford, and rent is higher there too. Patterson Lakes is closer to the city centre: 46.7 km, against 51.9 km. On these figures, Patterson Lakes tends to suit couples, while Seaford suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Seaford
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (9 vs 1)
- has more childcare (17 vs 3)
- has more parks and reserves (18 vs 8)
- But Patterson Lakes carries lower crime risk (60/100 vs 83/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Seaford
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($870,000 vs $1,338,000)
- has cheaper units ($610,000 vs $675,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Seaford
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (34% vs 16%)
- has cheaper rent ($351/wk vs $430/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Patterson Lakes
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (74/100 vs 62/100)
- has a shorter drive in (42 min vs 47 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (46.7 km vs 51.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Patterson Lakes
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (40% vs 26%)
- carries lower crime risk (60/100 vs 83/100)
- is more walkable (74/100 vs 62/100)
- But Seaford has more GPs (5 vs 2)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Patterson Lakes and Seaford drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Seaford has more residents (17,215 vs 7,793); Patterson Lakes has higher household incomes ($100,464 vs $78,000).
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,793 | 17,215 +121% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.0% | +4.6% |
| Median age | 46 | 40 |
| Median household income | $100,464/yr +22% vs other | $78,000/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $430/wk +18% vs other | $351/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,338,000 | $870,000 |
| Median unit price | $675,000 | $610,000 |
| Median land price | — | $850,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 65 sales | 24 days from 188 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
25 vs 91 sales
13 vs 55 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
53 vs 262 sales
51 vs 65 sales
21 vs 18 sales
Zoning mix
Seaford has more industrially zoned land (13% vs 0%).
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 61% | 45% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 24% same for both | |
| Parks and recreation | 9% | 17% |
| Industrial | 0% | 13% |
| Other and special use | 5% | 0% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 465 across Kingston (Vic.) | 725 across Frankston |
| Approvals change year on year | -36% | -47% |
Gross rental yield
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $1,200/wk on $1.6M | 4.0% $680/wk on $890K |
| Units | 4.7% $620/wk on $679K | 4.7% $550/wk on $605K |
Ranking within VIC
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 75% of VIC | Higher than 65% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 73% of VIC | Higher than 45% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 36% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 91% of VIC | Higher than 88% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 29% of VIC | Higher than 25% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 80% of VIC | Higher than 66% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 94% of VIC | Higher than 95% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 61% of VIC | Higher than 67% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 48% of VIC | Higher than 46% of VIC |
Liveability
Patterson Lakes scores higher overall (58 vs 41); Patterson Lakes is more walkable (74 vs 62).
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 58/100 | 41/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Seaford carries more crime risk (83 vs 60); Patterson Lakes carries more flood risk (86 vs 73).
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 60/100 | High 83/100 |
| Flood | High 86/100 | High 73/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 9 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 4 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 2 |
Schools in Patterson Lakes
- Patterson Lakes Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Seaford
- Kananook Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Belvedere Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Patterson River Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
- Seaford North Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Seaford Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Seaford Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 18 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 18 |
| Childcare | 3 | 17 |
| GPs | 2 | 5 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 3 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 7 |
| Waterways | 4 | 1 |
Mobility
Seaford sits further from the CBD (51.9 km vs 46.7 km).
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 74/100 | 62/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 46.7 km | 51.9 km +11% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 42 min | 47 min |
| Public transport score | 77/100 Bus | 94/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 43.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 206.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 3197 | 0.7% postcode 3198 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 29 postcode 3197 | 29 postcode 3198 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.8%).
Setting
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 6 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.0 km 2.2 km to a named beach | 1.2 km 1.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 87/100 | 89/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the curb same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 39% 3,612 premises | 46% 9,914 premises |
Climate
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | — same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.3°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.98 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,940/yr | $1,795/yr |
| Council | Kingston (Vic.) | Frankston |
Federal electorate
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dunkley same for both | |
| Member | Jodie Belyea same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Patterson Lakes | Seaford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Patterson Lakes
Other comparisons with Seaford
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.