Parkwood vs Canning Vale
Canning Vale is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 42 in Parkwood. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Parkwood, about half of households are couple families. In Canning Vale, most households are couple families. On these figures, Parkwood tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Canning Vale suits couples.
Canning Vale is significantly larger and more established, with a population of 34,504 compared to Parkwood's 5,995, and it scores notably higher on liveability (84 versus 70) and walkability (79 versus 64). Household incomes are substantially stronger in Canning Vale at $118,404 annually versus $83,148 in Parkwood, though Parkwood offers a slightly better rental yield at 4.0% against 3.7%. Parkwood suits buyers prioritising a quieter, smaller-town feel with minimal bushfire risk, while Canning Vale appeals to those seeking more amenities, services, and a higher socio-economic profile, despite its higher bushfire risk rating of 18.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Canning Vale
ahead on 5 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (23 vs 2)
- has more parks and reserves (65 vs 8)
- has more schools inside the suburb (8 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Parkwood
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $425/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Canning Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (79/100 vs 64/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Parkwood has more units and townhouses to downsize into (16% vs 6%)
- Canning Vale has more GPs (13 vs 4)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Canning Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (4.4% vs -0.6%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Parkwood and Canning Vale drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Canning Vale has more residents (34,504 vs 5,995); Canning Vale has higher household incomes ($118,404 vs $83,148).
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,995 | 34,504 +476% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.6% | +4.4% |
| Median age | 42 | 37 |
| Median household income | $83,148/yr | $118,404/yr +42% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk | $425/wk +21% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.3%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,030,000 | $1,060,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $587,500 |
| Median land price | — | $985,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 40 days from 40 sales | 28 days from 316 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
28 vs 103 sales
18 vs 348 sales
Development activity
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 423 across Canning same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -3% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $760/wk on $999K | 3.7% $850/wk on $1.2M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within WA
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 45% of WA | Higher than 85% of WA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 99% of WA |
| Walkability | Higher than 88% of WA | Higher than 95% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 75% of WA | Higher than 92% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 84% of WA | Higher than 90% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 24% of WA | Higher than 19% of WA |
Liveability
Canning Vale is more walkable (79 vs 64); Canning Vale scores higher overall (84 vs 70).
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 70/100 | 84/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Canning Vale carries more bushfire risk (18 vs 0).
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 18/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 59/100 | Moderate 54/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 | High 83/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 13 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 8 |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 6 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Curtin University of Technology, 4.7 km | 2 Murdoch University (Murdoch), 7.6 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.8% | 3.6% |
Schools in Parkwood
- Lynwood Senior High School Government · Secondary above peers
- Parkwood Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Canning Vale
- Caladenia Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Campbell Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Canning Vale College Government · Secondary above peers
- Canning Vale Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Excelsior Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Ranford Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 3 | 10 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 7 | 31 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 65 |
| Childcare | 2 | 23 |
| GPs | 4 | 13 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 6 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 3 | 5 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 9 |
| EV chargers | 2 same for both | |
| Waterways | 0 | 3 |
Mobility
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 64/100 | 79/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 20.3 km | 21.9 km +8% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 26 min | 25 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 94/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 187.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 1183.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 6147 | 1.7% postcode 6155 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 55 postcode 6147 | 82 postcode 6155 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (80.2%).
Setting
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 28 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 15.7 km 3.8 km to a named beach | 14.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 71/100 | 77/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 47% 2,782 premises | 54% 13,535 premises |
Climate
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 745 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.6°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,833/yr same for both | |
| Council | Canning same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Tangney same for both | |
| Member | Sam Lim same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Parkwood | Canning Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Parkwood
Canning Vale
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Parkwood
Other comparisons with Canning Vale
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.