Parkham vs Reedy Marsh
Parkham is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 53 in Reedy Marsh. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Parkham: a median of $814,000, against $736,000 in Reedy Marsh, though rent is higher in Reedy Marsh. On these figures, Parkham tends to suit families with children, while Reedy Marsh suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Reedy Marsh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (11 vs 6)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Parkham leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 26%)
- Reedy Marsh has cheaper houses ($736,000 vs $814,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Parkham
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (25% vs 5%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 29%)
- has cheaper rent ($270/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Reedy Marsh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (233.3 km vs 252 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Reedy Marsh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 17%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Reedy Marsh
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (7.6% vs -14.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Parkham and Reedy Marsh drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Reedy Marsh has more residents (199 vs 111); Reedy Marsh skews older (53 vs 31).
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 111 | 199 +79% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -14.0% | +7.6% |
| Median age | 31 | 53 |
| Median household income | $79,612/yr +33% vs other | $53,248/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $270/wk | $300/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $814,000 | $736,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Parkham has more rural and farming land (98% vs 59%); Reedy Marsh has more land zoned for conservation (39% vs 1%).
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 59% |
| Environmental | 1% | 39% |
| Other and special use | 2% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 202 across Meander Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +67% same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 71% of TAS | Higher than 25% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 67% of TAS | Higher than 58% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 61% of TAS | Higher than 60% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 22% of TAS | Higher than 30% of TAS |
Liveability
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 19/100 | Low 13/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 11 |
| Waterways | 7 | 0 |
Mobility
Parkham sits further from the CBD (252 km vs 233.3 km).
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 252 km +7% vs other | 233.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 179 min | 178 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 7304 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 32 postcode 7304 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.5%).
Setting
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 230 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 219 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 24.6 km | 33.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 17/100 | 25/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 22 premises | 0% 76 premises |
Climate
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 720 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $875/yr same for both | |
| Council | Meander Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyons same for both | |
| Member | Rebecca White same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Parkham | Reedy Marsh | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Parkham
Other comparisons with Reedy Marsh
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.