Pappinbarra vs Pipeclay
Pappinbarra is the younger of the two, with a median age of 45 against 51 in Pipeclay. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Pipeclay: a median of $1.2 million, against $514,000 in Pappinbarra, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Pappinbarra tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Pappinbarra
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 58/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (110% vs 100%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Pappinbarra
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($514,500 vs $1,200,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Pappinbarra
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($185/wk vs $400/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 25%)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Pappinbarra is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- Pipeclay sits closer to the CBD (397.3 km vs 408.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pappinbarra
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Pipeclay
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (59.4% vs 6.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Pappinbarra and Pipeclay drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pipeclay rents higher ($400/wk vs $185/wk); Pipeclay has higher household incomes ($84,500 vs $60,112).
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86 | 102 +19% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.2% | +59.4% |
| Median age | 45 | 51 |
| Median household income | $60,112/yr | $84,500/yr +41% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $185/wk | $400/wk +116% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.8%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.5%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $514,500 | $1,200,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 546 across Port Macquarie-Hastings same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +33% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 16% of NSW | Higher than 62% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 22% of NSW | Higher than 52% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 57% of NSW | Higher than 10% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 75% of NSW | Higher than 38% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 50% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 11% of NSW | Higher than 39% of NSW |
Liveability
Pappinbarra is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Pipeclay carries more crime risk (58 vs 13); Pappinbarra carries more bushfire risk (85 vs 60).
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 85/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Crime | Low 13/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 3 same for both | |
Mobility
Pappinbarra sits further from the CBD (408.5 km vs 397.3 km).
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 408.5 km +3% vs other | 397.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 298 min | 302 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2446 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 69 postcode 2446 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.7%).
Setting
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 146 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 28 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 38.1 km | 30.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 27/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 43 premises | 0% 35 premises |
Climate
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 2,842 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.7°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,325/yr same for both | |
| Council | Port Macquarie-Hastings same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyne same for both | |
| Member | Alison Penfold same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Pappinbarra | Pipeclay | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Pappinbarra
Pipeclay
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Pappinbarra
Other comparisons with Pipeclay
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.