Panorama vs Pasadena
Panorama is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 49 in Pasadena. In both, the large majority of households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Panorama, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Pasadena tends to suit people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Panorama
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (51/100 vs 73/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (89% vs 67%)
- is already more of a family suburb (64% vs 51%)
- But Pasadena has more parks and reserves (7 vs 4)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Pasadena
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($333/wk vs $380/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pasadena
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (33% vs 11%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (33% vs 22%)
- But Panorama carries lower crime risk (51/100 vs 73/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Pasadena
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.1% vs 3.2%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Panorama and Pasadena drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Panorama has higher household incomes ($96,876 vs $71,812); Pasadena has more residents (3,073 vs 2,388).
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,388 | 3,073 +29% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.5% | +2.7% |
| Median age | 43 | 49 |
| Median household income | $96,876/yr +26% vs other | $71,812/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $380/wk +12% vs other | $333/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,216,250 | $1,160,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $590,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 18 days from 31 sales | 18 days from 19 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
22 vs 15 sales
31 vs 12 sales
Zoning mix
Panorama has more land zoned for conservation (26% vs 12%).
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 74% | 64% |
| Environmental | 26% | 12% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 23% |
| Commercial | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 188 across Mitcham same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +32% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.2% $730/wk on $1.2M | 4.1% $750/wk on $945K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 51% of SA | Higher than 82% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 74% of SA | Higher than 45% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 94% of SA | Higher than 92% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 70% of SA | Higher than 7% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 83% of SA | Higher than 89% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 83% of SA | Higher than 80% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 20% of SA | Higher than 68% of SA |
Liveability
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 65/100 | 62/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Panorama carries more bushfire risk (26 vs 0); Pasadena carries more crime risk (73 vs 51).
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 26/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 51/100 | High 73/100 |
| Flood | High 71/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Tonsley, 2.4 km | 3 Tonsley, 1.7 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.1% | 3.0% |
Schools in Panorama
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Pasadena
- Springbank Secondary College Government · Secondary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 7 |
| Childcare | 1 | 3 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 83/100 | 79/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 9.7 km | 9.9 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 18 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 50.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 100.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 5041 | 1.5% postcode 5042 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 58 postcode 5041 | 54 postcode 5042 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (70.2%).
Setting
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 103 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 73 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.8 km | 7.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 71/100 | 66/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 47% 1,065 premises | 35% 1,498 premises |
Climate
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm | 394 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C | 28.1°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C | 7.8°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,296/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mitcham same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Panorama | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Panorama
Pasadena
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Panorama
Other comparisons with Pasadena
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.