Paluma vs Upper Stone
Upper Stone is the younger of the two, with a median age of 51 against 58 in Paluma. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Paluma, most households are people living alone. In Upper Stone, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Paluma tends to suit people living alone, while Upper Stone suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Upper Stone
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 27/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (52% vs 35%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Upper Stone
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 26%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Paluma
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($160/wk vs $234/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 17%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Paluma sits closer to the CBD (1466.2 km vs 1503.1 km)
- Upper Stone has a shorter drive in (1039 min vs 1166 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Upper Stone
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (11/100 vs 27/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Paluma and Upper Stone drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Upper Stone rents higher ($234/wk vs $160/wk); Upper Stone has more residents (111 vs 87).
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87 | 111 +28% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +27.9% | +27.6% |
| Median age | 58 | 51 |
| Median household income | $70,200/yr | $71,500/yr +2% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $160/wk | $234/wk +46% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.4%).
Property market
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $330,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 24 across Charters Towers | 23 across Hinchinbrook |
| Approvals change year on year | -67% | -86% |
Ranking within QLD
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 37% of QLD | Higher than 39% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 12% of QLD | Higher than 7% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 57% of QLD | Higher than 4% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 4% of QLD | Higher than 24% of QLD |
Liveability
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Paluma carries more crime risk (27 vs 11).
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 48/100 | Moderate 51/100 |
| Crime | Low 27/100 | Low 11/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 2 |
| Waterways | 120 | 30 |
Mobility
Upper Stone sits further from the CBD (1503.1 km vs 1466.2 km).
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 1466.2 km | 1503.1 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 1166 min | 1039 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 4816 | 0.1% postcode 4850 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 73 postcode 4816 | 51 postcode 4850 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (84.0%).
Setting
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 697 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 83 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 38.7 km | 32.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 17/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 45 premises | 0% 38 premises |
Council rates
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,328/yr | $1,516/yr |
| Council | Charters Towers | Hinchinbrook |
Federal electorate
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kennedy same for both | |
| Member | Bob Katter same for both | |
| Party | Katter's Australian Party (KAP) same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Paluma | Upper Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Paluma
Other comparisons with Upper Stone
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.