Pakenham vs Nar Nar Goon
Pakenham is the younger of the two, with a median age of 33 against 41 in Nar Nar Goon. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Pakenham: a median of $700,000, against $635,000 in Nar Nar Goon, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Pakenham tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Pakenham
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (26 vs 1)
- has more childcare (39 vs 4)
- has more schools inside the suburb (15 vs 3)
- But Nar Nar Goon has more separate houses rather than flats (98% vs 86%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Nar Nar Goon
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($420,000 vs $525,000)
- has cheaper houses ($635,000 vs $700,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Nar Nar Goon
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($305/wk vs $351/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Pakenham
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (94/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (62.4 km vs 71.6 km)
- has a shorter drive in (53 min vs 58 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pakenham
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (94/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (13 vs 1)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (14% vs 2%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Pakenham
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- is growing faster (16.6% vs 1.1%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.2% vs 3.7%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Pakenham and Nar Nar Goon drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pakenham has more residents (54,118 vs 1,023); Nar Nar Goon skews older (41 vs 33).
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54,118 +98% vs other | 1,023 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +16.6% | +1.1% |
| Median age | 33 | 41 |
| Median household income | $86,528/yr same for both | |
| Median weekly rent | $351/wk +13% vs other | $305/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700,000 | $635,000 |
| Median unit price | $515,000 | $565,000 |
| Median land price | $525,000 | $420,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 638 sales | 35 days from 11 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
767 vs 12 sales
598 vs 19 sales
39 vs 5 sales
Zoning mix
Nar Nar Goon has more rural and farming land (70% vs 45%).
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 45% | 70% |
| Residential | 29% | 6% |
| Other and special use | 6% | 20% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 8% | 4% |
| Industrial | 5% | 0% |
| Environmental | 3% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,323 across Cardinia same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +13% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.2% $580/wk on $718K | 3.7% $640/wk on $890K |
| Units | 4.9% $510/wk on $545K | — |
Ranking within VIC
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 41% of VIC | — |
| Income | Higher than 56% of VIC same for both | |
| Schools | Higher than 34% of VIC | Higher than 2% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 98% of VIC | Higher than 7% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 67% of VIC | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 69% of VIC | Higher than 36% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 87% of VIC | Higher than 72% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 80% of VIC | Higher than 50% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 54% of VIC | — |
Liveability
Pakenham is more walkable (94 vs 0); Pakenham scores higher overall (36 vs 22).
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | D |
| Score | 36/100 | 22/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Pakenham carries more bushfire risk (56 vs 15); Nar Nar Goon carries more flood risk (94 vs 78).
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 56/100 | Low 15/100 |
| Crime | High 74/100 | Moderate 68/100 |
| Flood | High 78/100 | High 94/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 9 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 15 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 7 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 4 | 2 |
Schools in Pakenham
- Beaconhills College Independent · Combined above peers
- Kuyim Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Lakeside College Independent · Combined at peers
- Pakenham Consolidated School Government · Primary at peers
- Pakenham Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Pakenham Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
Schools in Nar Nar Goon
- Nar Nar Goon Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- St James School Catholic · Primary below peers
- Chairo Christian School - Pakenham Campus Independent · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 9 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 18 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 26 | 1 |
| Childcare | 39 | 4 |
| GPs | 13 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 8 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 6 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 10 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 43 | 2 |
Mobility
Nar Nar Goon sits further from the CBD (71.6 km vs 62.4 km).
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 94/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 62.4 km | 71.6 km +15% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 53 min | 58 min |
| Public transport score | 83/100 Rail · Bus | 43/100 Rail |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 229.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 2.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 20 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 3810 | 0.4% postcode 3812 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 43 postcode 3810 | 68 postcode 3812 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.5%).
Setting
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 34 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 22 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 16.4 km | 15.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 | 31/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 59% 21,915 premises | 1% 416 premises |
Climate
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 781 mm | 1,350 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,880/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cardinia same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | La Trobe same for both | |
| Member | Jason Wood same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Pakenham | Nar Nar Goon | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Pakenham
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Pakenham
Other comparisons with Nar Nar Goon
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.