Pakenham South vs Pakenham
Pakenham is the younger of the two, with a median age of 33 against 46 in Pakenham South. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Pakenham South, most households are couple families. In Pakenham, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Pakenham South tends to suit couples and older residents, while Pakenham suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Pakenham South carries lower crime risk (51/100 vs 74/100)
- Pakenham has more childcare (39 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Pakenham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (24% vs 30%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Pakenham South
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (13% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($231/wk vs $351/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Pakenham
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (94/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (62.4 km vs 70.1 km)
- has a shorter drive in (53 min vs 58 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Pakenham South has more residents already 65 and over (24% vs 12%)
- Pakenham is more walkable (94/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Pakenham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (16.6% vs 6.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Pakenham South and Pakenham drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pakenham has more residents (54,118 vs 229); Pakenham rents higher ($351/wk vs $231/wk).
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 229 | 54,118 +23532% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.0% | +16.6% |
| Median age | 46 | 33 |
| Median household income | $89,856/yr +4% vs other | $86,528/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $231/wk | $351/wk +52% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $700,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $515,000 |
| Median land price | — | $525,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 28 days from 638 sales |
Zoning mix
Pakenham South has more rural and farming land (83% vs 45%).
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 83% | 45% |
| Residential | 0% | 29% |
| Other and special use | 13% | 6% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 8% |
| Industrial | 0% | 5% |
| Environmental | 0% | 3% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,323 across Cardinia same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +13% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.2% $580/wk on $718K |
| Units | — | 4.9% $510/wk on $545K |
Ranking within VIC
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 41% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 59% of VIC | Higher than 56% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 34% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 16% of VIC | Higher than 98% of VIC |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 67% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 69% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 53% of VIC | Higher than 87% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 80% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 54% of VIC |
Liveability
Pakenham is more walkable (94 vs 0).
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 36/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Pakenham carries more bushfire risk (56 vs 0); Pakenham carries more crime risk (74 vs 51).
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 51/100 | High 74/100 |
| Flood | High 99/100 | High 78/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 9 within 5 km |
Schools
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 15 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 7 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 4 |
Schools in Pakenham South
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Pakenham
- Beaconhills College Independent · Combined above peers
- Kuyim Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Lakeside College Independent · Combined at peers
- Pakenham Consolidated School Government · Primary at peers
- Pakenham Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Pakenham Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 9 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 18 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 26 |
| Childcare | 0 | 39 |
| GPs | 0 | 13 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 8 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 6 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 10 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 43 |
Mobility
Pakenham South sits further from the CBD (70.1 km vs 62.4 km).
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 94/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 70.1 km +11% vs other | 62.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 58 min | 53 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 3810 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 43 postcode 3810 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.5%).
Setting
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 6 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 34 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 10.1 km | 16.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 77/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 84 premises | 59% 21,915 premises |
Climate
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 781 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,880/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cardinia same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | La Trobe same for both | |
| Member | Jason Wood same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Pakenham South | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Pakenham South
Pakenham
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Pakenham South
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.