Paechtown vs Mount Barker
Mount Barker is the younger of the two, with a median age of 36 against 51 in Paechtown. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Paechtown, most households are couple families. Paechtown is closer to the city centre: 29.5 km, against 34.3 km. On these figures, Paechtown tends to suit couples, while Mount Barker suits people living alone and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Barker
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (18 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (8 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (8 vs 0)
- But Paechtown carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Barker
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (31% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $480/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Paechtown sits closer to the CBD (29.5 km vs 34.3 km)
- Mount Barker is more walkable (70/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Paechtown carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 59/100)
- Mount Barker is more walkable (70/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Barker
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (32.4% vs -3.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Paechtown and Mount Barker drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Barker has more residents (18,330 vs 204); Paechtown has higher household incomes ($124,072 vs $84,448).
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 204 | 18,330 +8885% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.8% | +32.4% |
| Median age | 51 | 36 |
| Median household income | $124,072/yr +32% vs other | $84,448/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $480/wk +27% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $821,250 |
| Median unit price | — | $590,000 |
| Median land price | — | $730,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 27 days from 421 sales |
Zoning mix
Paechtown has more rural and farming land (100% vs 38%).
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 38% |
| Residential | 0% | 53% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 4% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 2% |
| Industrial | 0% | 1% |
| Commercial | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 657 across Mount Barker same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -7% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.1% $640/wk on $815K |
| Units | — | 6.0% $625/wk on $545K |
Ranking within SA
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 3% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 94% of SA | Higher than 59% of SA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 9% of SA |
| Walkability | Higher than 6% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 95% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 80% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 44% of SA | Higher than 92% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 63% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 97% of SA |
Liveability
Mount Barker is more walkable (70 vs 0).
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 34/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Barker carries more crime risk (59 vs 13); Paechtown carries more bushfire risk (72 vs 53).
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 72/100 | Moderate 53/100 |
| Crime | Low 13/100 | Moderate 59/100 |
| Flood | — | Moderate 54/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 8 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 4 |
Schools in Paechtown
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mount Barker
- Cornerstone College Independent · Secondary at peers
- Mount Barker High School Government · Secondary at peers
- St Francis de Sales College Catholic · Combined at peers
- Mount Barker Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Mount Barker South Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Mount Barker Waldorf School Independent · Combined below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 6 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 17 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 8 |
| Childcare | 0 | 18 |
| GPs | 0 | 9 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 7 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 10 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 5 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 4 |
Mobility
Mount Barker sits further from the CBD (34.3 km vs 29.5 km).
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 70/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 29.5 km | 34.3 km +16% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 35 min | 33 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 5245 | 1.1% postcode 5251 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 73 postcode 5245 | 82 postcode 5251 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (76.0%).
Setting
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 395 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 328 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 27.4 km | 32.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 79/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 80 premises | 61% 10,696 premises |
Climate
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 730 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.7°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,485/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mount Barker same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Paechtown | Mount Barker | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Paechtown
Other comparisons with Mount Barker
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.