Packers Camp vs Wrights Creek
Wrights Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 45 in Packers Camp. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Packers Camp tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Packers Camp
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 56/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (85% vs 60%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Packers Camp
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (1687.1 km vs 1689.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Packers Camp
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 56/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Packers Camp
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (28.3% vs 2.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Packers Camp and Wrights Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Packers Camp skews older (45 vs 41).
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 136 | 160 +18% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +28.3% | +2.6% |
| Median age | 45 | 41 |
| Median household income | $124,748/yr | $135,564/yr +9% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.4%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 767 across Cairns same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -81% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 92% of QLD | Higher than 94% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 58% of QLD | Higher than 8% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 59% of QLD | Higher than 54% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 64% of QLD | Higher than 50% of QLD |
Liveability
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Wrights Creek carries more crime risk (56 vs 21).
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 21/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 7 | 3 |
Mobility
Wrights Creek sits further from the CBD (1689.5 km vs 1687.1 km).
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 1687.1 km | 1689.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 1165 min | 1164 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 4865 | 0.4% postcode 4869 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 74 postcode 4865 | 72 postcode 4869 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.0%).
Setting
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 0 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.0 km | 8.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 55 premises | 0% 76 premises |
Climate
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 2,121 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 18.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,354/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cairns same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kennedy same for both | |
| Member | Bob Katter same for both | |
| Party | Katter's Australian Party (KAP) same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Packers Camp | Wrights Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Wrights Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Packers Camp
Other comparisons with Wrights Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.