Osborne Park vs Woodlands
Osborne Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 34 against 44 in Woodlands. In Osborne Park, most households rent and most households are people living alone. In Woodlands, the large majority of households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Woodlands: a median of $1.9 million, against $940,000 in Osborne Park, and rent is higher there too. Osborne Park is closer to the city centre: 8 km, against 9.3 km. On these figures, Osborne Park tends to suit renters, young adults, and people living alone, while Woodlands suits families with children, couples, and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Woodlands
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (69% vs 18%)
- carries lower crime risk (30/100 vs 86/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (61% vs 31%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Osborne Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($940,000 vs $1,900,000)
- has cheaper units ($493,100 vs $667,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Osborne Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (56% vs 18%)
- has cheaper rent ($290/wk vs $420/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Woodlands
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (80/100 vs 71/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Woodlands
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (30/100 vs 86/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (24% vs 12%)
- is more walkable (80/100 vs 71/100)
- But Osborne Park has more GPs (6 vs 1)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Osborne Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.7% vs 3.0%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Osborne Park and Woodlands drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Woodlands rents higher ($420/wk vs $290/wk); Woodlands has higher household incomes ($109,096 vs $76,856).
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,463 | 4,551 +2% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.3% | +9.8% |
| Median age | 34 | 44 |
| Median household income | $76,856/yr | $109,096/yr +42% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk | $420/wk +45% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $940,000 | $1,900,000 |
| Median unit price | $493,100 | $667,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 23 sales | 27 days from 19 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
25 vs 15 sales
5 vs 33 sales
Development activity
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,557 across Stirling same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +23% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.7% $725/wk on $800K | 3.0% $1,000/wk on $1.73M |
| Units | 7.2% $625/wk on $449K | — |
Ranking within WA
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 39% of WA | Higher than 75% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of WA | Higher than 95% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 97% of WA | Higher than 96% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 79% of WA | Higher than 81% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 72% of WA | Higher than 7% of WA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 94% of WA | — |
Liveability
Woodlands scores higher overall (92 vs 66); Woodlands is more walkable (80 vs 71).
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A+ |
| Score | 66/100 | 92/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Osborne Park carries more crime risk (86 vs 30).
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 86/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 ECU City Campus, 6.7 km | 3 ECU City Campus, 8.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.0% | 3.5% |
Schools in Osborne Park
- Osborne Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Woodlands
- Holy Rosary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Woodlands Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 3 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 9 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Childcare | 7 | 6 |
| GPs | 6 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 4 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 4 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 7 | 0 |
Mobility
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 71/100 | 80/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 8 km | 9.3 km +16% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 11 min | 14 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus | 90/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 378.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 93.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.4% postcode 6017 | 2.2% postcode 6018 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 28 postcode 6017 | 43 postcode 6018 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (74.6%).
Setting
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 26 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.8 km | 3.5 km 3.8 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 66/100 | 68/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 19% 5,581 premises | 42% 1,952 premises |
Climate
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 650 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,615/yr same for both | |
| Council | Stirling same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Curtin same for both | |
| Member | Kate Chaney same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Osborne Park | Woodlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Osborne Park
Woodlands
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Osborne Park
Other comparisons with Woodlands
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.