Osborne Park vs Stirling
Osborne Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 34 against 42 in Stirling. In Osborne Park, most households rent and most households are people living alone. In Stirling, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Stirling: a median of $1.41 million, against $940,000 in Osborne Park, and rent is higher there too. Osborne Park is closer to the city centre: 8 km, against 10.2 km. On these figures, Osborne Park tends to suit renters, young adults, and people living alone, while Stirling suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Stirling
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (11 vs 1)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (87% vs 18%)
- carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 86/100)
- But Osborne Park has more childcare (7 vs 4)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Osborne Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($940,000 vs $1,405,000)
- has cheaper units ($493,100 vs $699,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Osborne Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (56% vs 16%)
- has cheaper rent ($290/wk vs $410/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Osborne Park sits closer to the CBD (8 km vs 10.2 km)
- Stirling is more walkable (82/100 vs 71/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Stirling
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (37/100 vs 86/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (19% vs 12%)
- is more walkable (82/100 vs 71/100)
- But Osborne Park has more units and townhouses to downsize into (82% vs 13%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Osborne Park and Stirling drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Stirling has more residents (10,165 vs 4,463); Stirling has higher household incomes ($115,492 vs $76,856).
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,463 | 10,165 +128% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.3% | +5.1% |
| Median age | 34 | 42 |
| Median household income | $76,856/yr | $115,492/yr +50% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk | $410/wk +41% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $940,000 | $1,405,000 |
| Median unit price | $493,100 | $699,000 |
| Median land price | — | $793,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 23 sales | 22 days from 114 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
25 vs 62 sales
5 vs 90 sales
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
19 vs 7 sales
46 vs 8 sales
Development activity
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,557 across Stirling same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +23% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.7% $725/wk on $800K | 5.0% $1,050/wk on $1.09M |
| Units | 7.2% $625/wk on $449K | — |
Ranking within WA
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 39% of WA | Higher than 81% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of WA | Higher than 96% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 97% of WA | Higher than 91% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 79% of WA | Higher than 87% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 72% of WA | Higher than 83% of WA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 94% of WA | — |
Liveability
Stirling scores higher overall (88 vs 66); Stirling is more walkable (82 vs 71).
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A+ |
| Score | 66/100 | 88/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Stirling carries more bushfire risk (25 vs 0); Osborne Park carries more crime risk (86 vs 37).
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 25/100 |
| Crime | High 86/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 ECU City Campus, 6.7 km | 2 ECU City Campus, 8.9 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.0% | 2.9% |
Schools in Osborne Park
- Osborne Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Stirling
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 3 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 9 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 11 |
| Childcare | 7 | 4 |
| GPs | 6 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 2 same for both | |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 4 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 4 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 7 | 0 |
Mobility
Stirling sits further from the CBD (10.2 km vs 8 km).
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 71/100 | 82/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 8 km | 10.2 km +27% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 11 min | 13 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 378.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 393.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.4% postcode 6017 | 1.6% postcode 6021 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 28 postcode 6017 | 44 postcode 6021 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (74.6%).
Setting
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 26 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 15 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.8 km | 5.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 66/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 19% 5,581 premises | 55% 4,302 premises |
Climate
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 650 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,615/yr same for both | |
| Council | Stirling same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Curtin | Cowan |
| Member | Kate Chaney | Anne Aly |
| Party | Independent | Australian Labor Party |
First Home Owner Grant
| Osborne Park | Stirling | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Osborne Park
Stirling
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Osborne Park
Other comparisons with Stirling
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.