Officer vs Pakenham
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Officer, most households are couple families. In Pakenham, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Officer tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Officer has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 1)
- Pakenham has more parks and reserves (26 vs 11)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Pakenham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($525,000 vs $711,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Pakenham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($351/wk vs $396/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Officer sits closer to the CBD (53.9 km vs 62.4 km)
- Pakenham is more walkable (94/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pakenham
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (94/100 vs 50/100)
- has more GPs (13 vs 9)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Officer
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (159.4% vs 16.6%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Officer and Pakenham drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pakenham has more residents (54,118 vs 18,503); Officer has higher household incomes ($110,500 vs $86,528).
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,503 | 54,118 +192% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +159.4% | +16.6% |
| Median age | 31 | 33 |
| Median household income | $110,500/yr +22% vs other | $86,528/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $396/wk +11% vs other | $351/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.9%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $755,000 | $700,000 |
| Median unit price | $552,500 | $515,000 |
| Median land price | $711,000 | $525,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 35 days from 429 sales | 28 days from 638 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
25 vs 41 sales
196 vs 767 sales
325 vs 598 sales
49 vs 39 sales
Zoning mix
Pakenham has more rural and farming land (45% vs 10%); Officer has more land zoned for conservation (21% vs 3%).
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 57% | 29% |
| Rural and farming | 10% | 45% |
| Environmental | 21% | 3% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 4% | 8% |
| Parks and recreation | 7% | 3% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 6% |
| Industrial | 0% | 5% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,323 across Cardinia same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +13% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.2% $620/wk on $765K | 4.2% $580/wk on $718K |
| Units | — | 4.9% $510/wk on $545K |
Ranking within VIC
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 48% of VIC | Higher than 41% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 56% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 41% of VIC | Higher than 34% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 86% of VIC | Higher than 98% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 84% of VIC | Higher than 67% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 88% of VIC | Higher than 69% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 97% of VIC | Higher than 87% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 81% of VIC | Higher than 80% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 54% of VIC |
Liveability
Pakenham is more walkable (94 vs 50); Officer scores higher overall (42 vs 36).
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 42/100 | 36/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Pakenham carries more flood risk (78 vs 61); Officer carries more bushfire risk (68 vs 56).
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 68/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Crime | High 73/100 | High 74/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 61/100 | High 78/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 9 within 5 km |
Schools
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 15 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 5 | 7 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 4 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Federation University Berwick, 5.8 km | None |
Schools in Officer
- Officer Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Officer Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- Bridgewood Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Kurrun Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Orchard Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- St Brigid's School Catholic · Primary at peers
Schools in Pakenham
- Beaconhills College Independent · Combined above peers
- Kuyim Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Lakeside College Independent · Combined at peers
- Pakenham Consolidated School Government · Primary at peers
- Pakenham Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Pakenham Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 9 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 8 | 18 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 26 |
| Childcare | 30 | 39 |
| GPs | 9 | 13 |
| Pharmacies | 3 | 8 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 6 |
| Fuel stations | 7 | 10 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 33 | 43 |
Mobility
Pakenham sits further from the CBD (62.4 km vs 53.9 km).
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 50/100 | 94/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 53.9 km | 62.4 km +16% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 50 min | 53 min |
| Public transport score | 80/100 Rail · Bus | 83/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 51.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 229.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 3809 | 0.8% postcode 3810 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 62 postcode 3809 | 43 postcode 3810 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.5%).
Setting
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 45 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 34 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 18.1 km | 16.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 95/100 | 77/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 92% 6,447 premises | 59% 21,915 premises |
Climate
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 781 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.98 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,880/yr same for both | |
| Council | Cardinia same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | La Trobe same for both | |
| Member | Jason Wood same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Officer | Pakenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Pakenham
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Officer
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.