Oakleigh South vs Clayton
Clayton is the younger of the two, with a median age of 28 against 40 in Oakleigh South. In Oakleigh South, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. In Clayton, most households rent. Houses cost more in Clayton: a median of $1.36 million, against $1.22 million in Oakleigh South. On these figures, Oakleigh South tends to suit couples, while Clayton suits renters, young adults, and share households.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Oakleigh South
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (3 vs 0)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (84% vs 35%)
- is already more of a family suburb (66% vs 36%)
- But Clayton has more parks and reserves (21 vs 12)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Oakleigh South has cheaper houses ($1,220,000 vs $1,365,000)
- Clayton has cheaper units ($550,000 vs $720,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Oakleigh South leaves renters under less rental stress (22% vs 27%)
- Clayton has a bigger rental market to choose from (63% vs 24%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Clayton
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (97/100 vs 80/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Clayton
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (10 vs 0)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (64% vs 16%)
- is more walkable (97/100 vs 80/100)
- But Oakleigh South has more residents already 65 and over (19% vs 10%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Clayton
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.9% vs 3.2%)
- returns a higher gross yield on units (5.3% vs 4.7%)
- But Oakleigh South is growing faster (6.4% vs -1.9%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Oakleigh South and Clayton drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Clayton has more residents (18,988 vs 9,851); Oakleigh South skews older (40 vs 28).
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,851 | 18,988 +93% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.4% | -1.9% |
| Median age | 40 | 28 |
| Median household income | $99,580/yr +22% vs other | $77,688/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $418/wk +4% vs other | $400/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,220,000 | $1,365,000 |
| Median unit price | $720,000 | $550,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,541,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 22 days from 69 sales | 25 days from 56 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
27 vs 126 sales
17 vs 48 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
7 vs 8 sales
50 vs 63 sales
39 vs 17 sales
8 vs 7 sales
Zoning mix
Clayton has more commercially zoned land (48% vs 2%).
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial | 2% | 48% |
| Residential | 40% | 4% |
| Other and special use | 33% | 11% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 24% |
| Industrial | 13% | 12% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,233 across Monash same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -4% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.2% $750/wk on $1.24M | 3.9% $700/wk on $945K |
| Units | 4.7% $562/wk on $625K | 5.3% $550/wk on $544K |
Ranking within VIC
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 78% of VIC | Higher than 82% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 72% of VIC | Higher than 45% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 99% of VIC | Higher than 22% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 93% of VIC | Higher than 99% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 23% of VIC | Higher than 7% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 93% of VIC | Higher than 94% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 90% of VIC | Higher than 94% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 20% of VIC | Higher than 59% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 44% of VIC | Higher than 73% of VIC |
Liveability
Oakleigh South scores higher overall (82 vs 55); Clayton is more walkable (97 vs 80).
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A+ | B |
| Score | 82/100 | 55/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Clayton carries more flood risk (34 vs 24); Clayton carries more crime risk (85 vs 66).
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 66/100 | High 85/100 |
| Flood | Low 24/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 23 within 5 km | 21 within 5 km |
Schools
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 3 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Monash Clayton, 3.2 km | 3 Monash Clayton, 0.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.9% | 17.3% |
Schools in Oakleigh South
- Huntingdale Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Oakleigh South Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- South Oakleigh College Government · Secondary above peers
Schools in Clayton
- Clayton North Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- St Peter's School Catholic · Primary below peers
- John Monash Science School Government · Secondary
- SEDA College (Victoria) - AFL - Clayton Independent · Secondary
- Monash Children's Hospital School Government · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 11 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 5 | 81 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 21 |
| Childcare | 11 | 14 |
| GPs | 0 | 10 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 5 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 4 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 6 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 5 |
| EV chargers | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 80/100 | 97/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 22 km | 22.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 30 min | 29 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 84/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 291.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 590.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.9% postcode 3167 | 2.0% postcode 3168 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 28 postcode 3167 | 14 postcode 3168 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (54.5%).
Setting
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 61 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 88 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.8 km | 10.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 80/100 | 87/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 16% 4,564 premises | 49% 10,841 premises |
Climate
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 644 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 7.6 µg/m³ | 6.3 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | — | 20.8 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | — | 0.98 pphm |
Council rates
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,697/yr same for both | |
| Council | Monash same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hotham same for both | |
| Member | Clare O'Neil same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Oakleigh South | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Oakleigh South
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Oakleigh South
Other comparisons with Clayton
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.