Oakhampton vs Rutherford
Rutherford is the younger of the two, with a median age of 35 against 68 in Oakhampton. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Oakhampton, most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Oakhampton: a median of $4.65 million, against $755,000 in Rutherford, though rent is higher in Rutherford. On these figures, Oakhampton tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Rutherford suits families with children and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Rutherford
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (10 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Rutherford
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($755,000 vs $4,650,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (27% vs 33%)
- But Oakhampton has cheaper land ($190,000 vs $835,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Oakhampton has cheaper rent ($325/wk vs $360/wk)
- Rutherford has a bigger rental market to choose from (36% vs 10%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Oakhampton
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (56% vs 18%)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (27% vs 13%)
- But Rutherford has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Rutherford
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.2% vs -13.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Oakhampton and Rutherford drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rutherford has more residents (13,091 vs 165); Oakhampton skews older (68 vs 35).
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 165 | 13,091 +7834% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -13.2% | +10.2% |
| Median age | 68 | 35 |
| Median household income | $58,500/yr | $76,700/yr +31% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $325/wk | $360/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.4%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $4,650,000 | $755,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $565,000 |
| Median land price | $190,000 | $835,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 23 days from 192 sales |
Zoning mix
Oakhampton has more rural and farming land (74% vs 1%); Rutherford has more industrially zoned land (31% vs 0%).
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 74% | 1% |
| Residential | 12% | 38% |
| Industrial | 0% | 31% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 13% |
| Environmental | 12% | 8% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 10% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,413 across Maitland same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +20% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.2% $655/wk on $808K |
| Units | — | 4.2% $500/wk on $625K |
Ranking within NSW
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 98% of NSW | Higher than 29% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 19% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 30% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 70% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 1% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 55% of NSW | Higher than 56% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 83% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 29% of NSW |
Liveability
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 28/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Oakhampton carries more bushfire risk (21 vs 0).
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 21/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 77/100 | High 86/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Oakhampton
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Rutherford
- Rutherford Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Rutherford Technology High School Government · Secondary at peers
- St Paul's Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 6 |
| Childcare | 0 | 10 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 8 |
| Waterways | 3 | 9 |
Mobility
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 21/100 | 28/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 171.7 km | 171.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 133 min | 132 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2320 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 2320 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.4%).
Setting
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 9 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 25.1 km | 28.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 43/100 | 74/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 5% 113 premises | 53% 6,279 premises |
Climate
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 996 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,908/yr same for both | |
| Council | Maitland same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Paterson same for both | |
| Member | Meryl Swanson same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Oakhampton | Rutherford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Oakhampton
Rutherford
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Oakhampton
Other comparisons with Rutherford
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.