Oakford vs Darling Downs
Darling Downs is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 42 in Oakford. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Oakford is closer to the city centre: 34.9 km, against 38.9 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Darling Downs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($820,000 vs $1,000,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Oakford
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (34 min vs 40 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (34.9 km vs 38.9 km)
- But Darling Downs is more walkable (12/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Darling Downs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (12/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Darling Downs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (32.6% vs 6.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Oakford and Darling Downs drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Oakford has more residents (2,803 vs 1,591); Oakford skews older (42 vs 39).
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,803 +43% vs other | 1,591 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.5% | +32.6% |
| Median age | 42 | 39 |
| Median household income | $127,452/yr | $128,960/yr +1% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,640,000 | $1,529,750 |
| Median unit price | — | $416,250 |
| Median land price | $1,000,000 | $820,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 13 days from 11 sales | 22 days from 7 sales |
Development activity
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 859 across Serpentine-Jarrahdale same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +104% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.1% $680/wk on $1.7M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within WA
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 90% of WA | Higher than 91% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 10% of WA | Higher than 71% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 61% of WA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 65% of WA | Higher than 82% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 1% of WA |
Liveability
Darling Downs is more walkable (12 vs 0).
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 39/100 | 37/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Darling Downs carries more bushfire risk (61 vs 37).
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 37/100 | Moderate 61/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 45/100 | Moderate 53/100 |
| Flood | High 78/100 | High 76/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
Darling Downs sits further from the CBD (38.9 km vs 34.9 km).
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 12/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 34.9 km | 38.9 km +11% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 34 min | 40 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 6121 | 0.6% postcode 6122 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 98 postcode 6121 | 92 postcode 6122 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.2%).
Setting
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 18 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 37 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 14.7 km | 20.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 36/100 | 69/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 9% 998 premises | 53% 714 premises |
Climate
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 745 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.6°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,810/yr same for both | |
| Council | Serpentine-Jarrahdale same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Burt same for both | |
| Member | Matt Keogh same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Oakford | Darling Downs | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Oakford
Other comparisons with Darling Downs
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.