O'malley vs Phillip
Phillip is the younger of the two, with a median age of 32 against 51 in O'Malley. In O'Malley, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. In Phillip, about half of households rent, most homes are flats or apartments, and most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in O'Malley: a median of $2.4 million, against $750,000 in Phillip, and rent is higher there too. Phillip is closer to the city centre: 12.1 km, against 14.2 km. On these figures, O'Malley tends to suit couples and older residents, while Phillip suits renters, young adults, and people living alone.
O'Malley and Phillip represent very different living environments in ACT. O'Malley is a small, affluent enclave of 928 people with a median household income of $232,752 and median house prices around $2,400,000, though it carries a notably higher crime risk score of 12 compared to Phillip's 87. Phillip is a larger, younger suburb of 5,197 people with a median age of 32 and a walkability score of 92, making it far more pedestrian-friendly than O'Malley's score of 38, but properties here are considerably more affordable—median houses at $740,000 and units at $540,000. O'Malley suits buyers prioritising privacy, space, and lower crime in an established, wealthy pocket; Phillip appeals to those valuing walkability, affordability, and a younger demographic closer to the CBD.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
O'Malley
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (96% vs 0%)
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 91/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (74% vs 29%)
- But Phillip has more childcare (5 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Phillip
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($750,000 vs $2,400,000)
- has cheaper units ($535,000 vs $1,510,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Phillip
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (50% vs 11%)
- has cheaper rent ($440/wk vs $975/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Phillip
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 38/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (12.1 km vs 14.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Phillip
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (100% vs 4%)
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 38/100)
- But O'Malley carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 91/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- O'malley returns a higher gross yield on houses (5.7% vs 4.8%)
- Phillip is growing faster (77.0% vs -6.4%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
O'malley and Phillip drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Phillip has more residents (5,197 vs 928); O'Malley rents higher ($975/wk vs $440/wk).
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 928 | 5,197 +460% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -6.4% | +77.0% |
| Median age | 51 | 32 |
| Median household income | $232,752/yr +54% vs other | $107,900/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $975/wk +55% vs other | $440/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (36.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,400,000 | $750,000 |
| Median unit price | $1,510,000 | $535,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 34 days from 8 sales | 26 days from 8 sales |
Development activity
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.7% $1,775/wk on $1.62M | 4.8% $628/wk on $678K |
| Units | — | 6.2% $600/wk on $500K |
Ranking within ACT
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 100% of ACT | Higher than 15% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 24% of ACT | Higher than 100% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 51% of ACT | Higher than 49% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 62% of ACT | Higher than 70% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 99% of ACT | Higher than 85% of ACT |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 61% of ACT |
Liveability
Phillip is more walkable (92 vs 38); O'Malley scores higher overall (61 vs 45).
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 61/100 | 45/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Phillip carries more crime risk (91 vs 12); Phillip carries more flood risk (40 vs 16).
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 89/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 12/100 | High 91/100 |
| Flood | Low 16/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 UNSW Canberra, 5.6 km | 2 UNSW Canberra, 6.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.6% | 2.3% |
Schools in O'malley
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Phillip
- The Canberra College Government · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 52 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 same for both | |
| Childcare | 0 | 5 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 4 |
| Police stations | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 8 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
O'Malley sits further from the CBD (14.2 km vs 12.1 km).
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 38/100 | 92/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 14.2 km +15% vs other | 12.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 21 min | 18 min |
| Public transport score | 63/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 16.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 319.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 3.4% postcode 2606 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 20 postcode 2606 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.5%).
Setting
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 679 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 589 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 73/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 36% 465 premises | 35% 3,650 premises |
Climate
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 686 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.2°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 7.3 µg/m³ | 5.4 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 11.9 µg/m³ | 14.1 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.32 pphm | — |
Council rates
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bean same for both | |
| Member | David Smith same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| O'malley | Phillip | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with O'malley
Other comparisons with Phillip
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.