Norwood vs Rose Park
Norwood is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 44 in Rose Park. In Norwood, about half of households rent and about half of households are people living alone. In Rose Park, most households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Rose Park: a median of $2.67 million, against $1.51 million in Norwood, though rent is higher in Norwood. On these figures, Norwood tends to suit renters, young adults, and people living alone, while Rose Park suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Norwood has more parks and reserves (9 vs 2)
- Rose Park carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 78/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Norwood
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,510,000 vs $2,675,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Norwood has a bigger rental market to choose from (46% vs 27%)
- Rose Park leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 22%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Norwood
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 84/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Norwood
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (5 vs 0)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (65% vs 43%)
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 84/100)
- But Rose Park carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 78/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Norwood is growing faster (6.7% vs 0.1%)
- Rose Park returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.2% vs 3.4%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Norwood and Rose Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Norwood has more residents (6,354 vs 1,375); Rose Park has higher household incomes ($125,372 vs $91,104).
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,354 +78% vs other | 1,375 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.7% | +0.1% |
| Median age | 40 | 44 |
| Median household income | $91,104/yr | $125,372/yr +38% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $390/wk +6% vs other | $365/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,510,000 | $2,675,000 |
| Median unit price | $631,750 | $630,000 |
| Median land price | $1,502,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 23 days from 71 sales | 35 days from 9 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
35 vs 6 sales
87 vs 8 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
66 vs 8 sales
31 vs 6 sales
6 vs 7 sales
Zoning mix
Norwood has more commercially zoned land (24% vs 12%).
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 72% | 83% |
| Commercial | 24% | 12% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 5% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 227 across Norwood Payneham and St Peters | 250 across Burnside |
| Approvals change year on year | +141% | +32% |
Gross rental yield
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $802/wk on $1.23M | 4.2% $1,400/wk on $1.75M |
| Units | 4.4% $685/wk on $810K | — |
Ranking within SA
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 85% of SA | Higher than 99% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 70% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Schools | Higher than 96% of SA | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 99% of SA | Higher than 95% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 16% of SA | Higher than 4% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 94% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of SA | Higher than 85% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 27% of SA | Higher than 70% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 37% of SA | — |
Liveability
Rose Park scores higher overall (95 vs 78); Norwood is more walkable (92 vs 84).
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | A+ |
| Score | 78/100 | 95/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Norwood carries more flood risk (71 vs 11); Norwood carries more crime risk (78 vs 27).
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 78/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | High 71/100 | Low 11/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 2.9 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 2.5 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.0% | 4.8% |
Schools in Norwood
- Norwood Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- St Joseph's Memorial School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Saint Ignatius' College - Junior School Campus Catholic · Combined
Schools in Rose Park
- Rose Park Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 3 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 44 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 2 |
| Childcare | 6 | 3 |
| GPs | 5 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 5 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 8 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| EV chargers | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 30 | 0 |
Mobility
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 92/100 | 84/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 3.4 km +6% vs other | 3.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 8 min | 7 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 76/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 212.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 27.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.0% postcode 5067 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 37 postcode 5067 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (56.8%).
Setting
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 62 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 63 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 12.2 km | 11.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 81/100 | 74/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 21% 4,602 premises | 1% 741 premises |
Climate
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,995/yr | $2,410/yr |
| Council | Norwood Payneham and St Peters | Burnside |
Federal electorate
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Sturt same for both | |
| Member | Claire Clutterham same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Norwood | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Norwood
Rose Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Norwood
Other comparisons with Rose Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.