North Turramurra vs Mount Colah
Mount Colah is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 56 in North Turramurra. In both, the large majority of households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In North Turramurra, about half of households are couple families. In Mount Colah, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in North Turramurra: a median of $2.83 million, against $1.67 million in Mount Colah, and rent is higher there too. North Turramurra is closer to the city centre: 27.5 km, against 31.2 km. On these figures, North Turramurra tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Mount Colah suits families with children, couples, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Colah
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (6 vs 3)
- is already more of a family suburb (76% vs 57%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (84% vs 71%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Colah
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($630,000 vs $1,570,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (23% vs 41%)
- has cheaper houses ($1,671,175 vs $2,835,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Colah
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (18% vs 8%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (21% vs 37%)
- has cheaper rent ($525/wk vs $760/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
North Turramurra
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (37 min vs 46 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (27.5 km vs 31.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
North Turramurra
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (41% vs 13%)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (29% vs 16%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Colah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.2% vs -1.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
North Turramurra and Mount Colah drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Colah has more residents (7,816 vs 4,194); North Turramurra rents higher ($760/wk vs $525/wk).
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,194 | 7,816 +86% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.5% | +10.2% |
| Median age | 56 | 40 |
| Median household income | $107,328/yr | $130,260/yr +21% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $760/wk +31% vs other | $525/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,835,000 | $1,671,175 |
| Median unit price | $1,570,000 | $630,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 44 days from 7 sales | 23 days from 67 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
12 vs 42 sales
14 vs 44 sales
9 vs 21 sales
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
5 vs 13 sales
14 vs 29 sales
7 vs 5 sales
Zoning mix
North Turramurra has more land zoned for conservation (91% vs 67%).
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 91% | 67% |
| Residential | 2% | 24% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 6% |
| Parks and recreation | 5% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 908 across Ku-ring-gai | 260 across Hornsby |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% | -79% |
Gross rental yield
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.9% $990/wk on $1.8M |
| Units | — | 5.4% $660/wk on $638K |
Ranking within NSW
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 93% of NSW | Higher than 79% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 89% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 78% of NSW | Higher than 80% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 7% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 98% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 92% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 16% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 81% of NSW |
Liveability
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 91/100 | High 87/100 |
| Crime | Low 18/100 same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in North Turramurra
- Ku-ring-gai High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Turramurra North Public School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Mount Colah
- Mount Colah Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Gibberagong Environmental Education Centre Government · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 6 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 same for both | |
| Childcare | 3 | 6 |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 9 | 11 |
Mobility
Mount Colah sits further from the CBD (31.2 km vs 27.5 km).
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 40/100 | 45/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 27.5 km | 31.2 km +13% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 37 min | 46 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 141.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 177.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 3.7% postcode 2074 | 1.7% postcode 2079 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 30 postcode 2074 | 40 postcode 2079 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (60.4%).
Setting
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 167 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 140 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 14.0 km | 13.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 74/100 | 84/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 1,890 premises | 34% 2,951 premises |
Climate
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,176 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.23 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,626/yr | $1,488/yr |
| Council | Ku-ring-gai | Hornsby |
Federal electorate
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bradfield | Berowra |
| Member | Nicolette Boele | Julian Leeser |
| Party | Independent | Liberal |
First Home Owner Grant
| North Turramurra | Mount Colah | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
North Turramurra
Mount Colah
More comparisons
Other comparisons with North Turramurra
Other comparisons with Mount Colah
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.